Adam Walton and Tung-Lin Wu will face off in the 2nd round of the Pune Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adam Walton is the pick to win this match.
Adam Walton -> 1.4
Tung-Lin Wu -> 2.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Tung-Lin Wu
There is no head to head record between Adam Walton and Tung-Lin Wu since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Adam Walton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-15 | 36-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 154, Walton reached the 2nd round after beating Raphael Collignon 7-61 6-2.
In the 1st round, Adam had a good straight sets win against Collignon (7-61 6-2). During the match, Walton scored 69 points vs Collignon’s 48. Adam was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Walton managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Adam Walton was extremely efficient on serve to win 82% (31/38) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Adam broke Collignon 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Walton has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 68% of his matches (119-56). 11-5 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Walton has an overall114-47 record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Burnie 2 Challenger where he overcame Dane Sweeny in the final 6-2 7-6(4).
Walton has an aggregate 11-5 win-loss record in 2024, 11-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pune Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Tung-Lin Wu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-13 | 11-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 242, the Chinese reached the 2nd round after defeating Gauthier Onclin 7-65 6-75 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Chinese defeated Onclin (7-65 6-75 6-3). During the match Wu scored 116 points vs Onclin’s 115. Tung-Lin was pretty aggressive to blast 57 winners.
Talking about serving, Wu recorded 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tung-Lin Wu lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 67% of his first serves in, winning 70% (57/82) of the points behind his 1st serve and 66% (27/41) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Onclin twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
The Chinese has an overall 2-5 win-loss record in 2024, 2-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 35 |
| Pts | 69-48 | 116-115 |
| Total Points | 117 | 231 |
| Winners | 31 | 57 |
| %Winners | 45% | 49% |
Both Walton and Wu played 1 match. At the moment, Tung-Lin Wu surrendered 1 set while Adam Walton hasn’t lost a set so far. Walton has played 1 set(s) less than Wu (2 vs 3). Therefore, Walton played 14 games less than Wu. The Australian scored 31 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese fired 57 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 82/123 |
| %1st in | 63% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 57/82 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 27/41 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 66% |
Walton scored 3 aces . Wu fired 8 aces . Walton won 82% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 29% |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Adam lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Chinese broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Tung-Lin conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | |||
| R1 Collignon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 69-48 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 38/60 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Wu | |||
| R1 Onclin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-75 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 116-115 | 116-115 | |
| Total points | 231 | 231 | |
| Winners | 57 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 82/123 | 82/123 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 57/82 | 57/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/41 | 27/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWLW
LLWWLLWWWL Tennis Scores in Pune Challenger
- Adam WaltonWalton – Raphael CollignonCollignon (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Maxime JanvierJanvier (4-6 6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Felix GillGill – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (5-7 7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (7-65 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaKaliyanda Poonacha – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (6-3 6-72 7-63) – See score progression
- Mukund SasikumarSasikumar – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-6(6) 6-4) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-6(5) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (5-7 7-6(1) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaKaliyanda Poonacha (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
