Felix Gill and Mukund Sasikumar will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Pune Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Felix Gill who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Felix Gill is the pick to win this match.
Felix Gill -> 1.81
Mukund Sasikumar -> 1.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Felix Gill vs. Mukund Sasikumar
There is no head to head record between Felix Gill and Mukund Sasikumar since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Felix Gill
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-17 | 4-2 | 19-12 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-24 | 7-4 | 36-19 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-21 | 1-2 | 24-13 | 5-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-19 | 0-0 | 32-17 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 344 (career-high), Gill got to the 2nd round after defeating Arnav Vijay Paparkar 6-3 6-4, Evgeny Donskoy 7-5 6-2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong 7-64 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Felix defeated Lam Coleman Wong (7-64 4-6 6-3). During the match, Gill scored 93 points vs Lam Coleman Wong’s 86. Felix was extremely aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gill blasted 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Felix Gill was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (51/67) of his 1st serve and 59% (19/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Gill broke Lam Coleman Wong twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Gill has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (130-78). 3-0 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Gill has a compiled15-8 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Gill’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Piracicaba Challenger.
The Brit has a compiled 11-4 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pune Challenger
Gill has never competed in this tournament before.
Mukund Sasikumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-17 | 16-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-31 | 21-25 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-35 | 33-21 | 6-7 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-32 | 25-24 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-9 | 4-4 | 0-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 457, the Indian got to the 2nd round after beating Federico Gaio 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Gaio (6-3 6-2). During the match Kumar Mukund scored 59 points vs Gaio’s 34. The Indian was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Kumar Mukund managed to score 12 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mukund Sasikumar was extremely efficient on serve to win 85% (29/34) of his 1st serve and 88% (7/8) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kumar Mukund broke Gaio 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Sasi’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Chennai.
The Indian has an aggregate 8-5 win-loss record in 2024, 8-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pune Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2018 and 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gill | Kumar Mukund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 71 | 17 |
| Pts | 216-171 | 59-34 |
| Total Points | 387 | 93 |
| Winners | 99 | 29 |
| %Winners | 46% | 49% |
Gill played 3 matches while Kumar Mukund competed in 1 match. Gill started his run from the qualifications while Kumar Mukund had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Felix Gill surrendered 1 set while Mukund Sasikumar hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gill has played 5 sets more than Kumar Mukund (7 vs 2). Therefore, Gill played 54 games more than Kumar Mukund. The Brit scored 99 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Kumar Mukund made 29 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gill | Kumar Mukund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 4.3 | 12 |
| 1st in | 130/198 | 34/42 |
| %1st in | 66% | 81% |
| 1st pts | 99/130 | 29/34 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 49/68 | 7/8 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 88% |
Gill scored 13 aces (4.3 per match). Kumar Mukund fired 12 aces . Gill won 76% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Kumar Mukund won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 88% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gill | Kumar Mukund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 3 |
| Converted | 8/12 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 67% | 60% |
| Conceded | 9 | 0 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Gill broke his opponents 8 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Brit dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Sasi was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Gill | |||||
| Q1 Vijay |
Q3 Donskoy |
R1 Lam Coleman Wong |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-5 6-2 | 7-64 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 | 32 | 71 | |
| pts | 61-45 | 62-40 | 93-86 | 216-171 | |
| Total points | 106 | 102 | 179 | 387 | |
| Winners | 23 | 25 | 51 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 40% | 55% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 29/50 | 34/49 | 67/99 | 130/198 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 69% | 68% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 25/34 | 51/67 | 99/130 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 74% | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 13/15 | 19/32 | 49/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 87% | 59% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 4/4 | 2/3 | 8/12 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 100% | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 75% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Kumar Mukund | |||||
| R1 Gaio |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |||
| pts | 59-34 | 59-34 | |||
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |||
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |||
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |||
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1st in | 34/42 | 34/42 | |||
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |||
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 29/34 | |||
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |||
| 2nd pts | 7/8 | 7/8 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 88% | 88% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |||
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |||
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |||
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |||
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |||
| Saved % | – | 0% | |||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLLW
WWLLLLWWLL Tennis Scores in Pune Challenger
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (5-7 7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Raphael CollignonCollignon (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Felix GillGill – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Maxime JanvierJanvier (4-6 6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (7-65 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaKaliyanda Poonacha – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (6-3 6-72 7-63) – See score progression
- Mukund SasikumarSasikumar – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-6(6) 6-4) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-6(5) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (5-7 7-6(1) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaKaliyanda Poonacha (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
