Paul Jubb and Clement Chidekh will face off in the final of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Clement Chidekh who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Clement Chidekh is the pick to win this match.
Clement Chidekh -> 1.87
Paul Jubb -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Clement Chidekh
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Clement Chidekh since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 502, Jubb reached the final after defeating George Houghton 7-5 6-3, David Poljak 7-5 6-3, Francesco Maestrelli 6-4 5-7 6-3, Charlie Robertson 6-2 6-2, Henry Searle 6-4 4-6 6-2 and Elmar Ejupovic 4-6 7-63 6-3.
In the semifinal against Ejupovic, Jubb recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-63 6-3). During the match, Jubb scored 111 points vs Ejupovic’s 90. Paul was very aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jubb fired 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Paul Jubb was very effective on serve to win 86% (50/58) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Ejupovic twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Paul started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 3 set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Jubb has a fantastic match record in the last 8 years having won 71% of his matches (182-76). 9-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jubb has an overall25-14 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Jubb’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger and the Glasgow Challenger.
The Brit has an aggregate 13-5 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Paul has never competed in this tournament before.
Clement Chidekh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 64-26 | 17-7 | 7-6 | 39-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-17 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 26-5 | 23-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 563, Clement reached the final after beating Kacper Zuk 7-5 6-2, Carlos Taberner 6-4 6-2, Hamish Stewart 4-6 6-4 6-4 and Manuel Guinard 6-3 6-4.
In the semifinal, The French player had a good straight sets win against Guinard (6-3 6-4). During the match Chidekh scored 65 points vs Guinard’s 55. Chidekh was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Chidekh couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Clement Chidekh was extremely efficient on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Guinard 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Chidekh has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The French player best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Grenoble.
The French player has a compiled 12-4 win-loss record in 2024, 12-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 6 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 15 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 149 | 87 |
| Pts | 518-413 | 321-277 |
| Total Points | 931 | 598 |
| Winners | 219 | 139 |
| %Winners | 42% | 43% |
Jubb played 6 matches while Chidekh competed in 4 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while Chidekh had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Paul Jubb dropped 3 sets, while Clement Chidekh lost 1 set. Jubb has played 6 sets more than Chidekh (15 vs 9). Therefore, Jubb played 62 games more than Chidekh. Jubb scored 219 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Chidekh managed to score 139 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 45 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 1.5 |
| 1st in | 270/404 | 190/314 |
| %1st in | 67% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 219/270 | 139/190 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 82/134 | 67/124 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 54% |
Jubb blasted 45 aces (7.5 per match). Chidekh blasted 6 aces (1.5 per match). Jubb won 81% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Chidekh won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 19 | 13 |
| Converted | 19/50 | 13/27 |
| % Converted | 38% | 48% |
| Conceded | 16 | 26 |
| Saved | 11 | 22 |
| % Saved | 69% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Paul broke his opponents 19 times with a 38% conversion rate. Paul surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Chidekh broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | ||||||||
| Q1 Houghton |
Q3 Poljak |
R1 Maestrelli |
R2 Robertson |
1/4 Searle |
1/2 Ejupovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | 4-6 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | 31 | 16 | 28 | 32 | 149 | |
| pts | 72-53 | 67-54 | 108-97 | 68-46 | 92-73 | 111-90 | 518-413 | |
| Total points | 125 | 121 | 205 | 114 | 165 | 201 | 931 | |
| Winners | 28 | 34 | 42 | 24 | 41 | 50 | 219 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 51% | 39% | 35% | 45% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||||
| Aces | 11 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 45 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 40/56 | 57/91 | 31/54 | 50/70 | 58/80 | 270/404 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 71% | 63% | 57% | 71% | 73% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 34/40 | 42/57 | 24/31 | 41/50 | 50/58 | 219/270 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 85% | 74% | 77% | 82% | 86% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/19 | 9/16 | 19/34 | 13/23 | 11/20 | 14/22 | 82/134 | |
| % 2nd pts | 84% | 56% | 56% | 57% | 55% | 64% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 19 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 3/8 | 4/11 | 4/9 | 4/5 | 2/9 | 19/50 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 38% | 36% | 44% | 80% | 22% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 16 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 5/7 | 3/3 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 11 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 71% | 100% | 0% | 50% | 54% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| Chidekh | ||||||||
| R1 Zuk |
R2 Taberner |
1/4 Stewart |
1/2 Guinard |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |||
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 | 30 | 19 | 87 | |||
| pts | 66-49 | 73-58 | 117-115 | 65-55 | 321-277 | |||
| Total points | 115 | 131 | 232 | 120 | 598 | |||
| Winners | 24 | 27 | 55 | 33 | 139 | |||
| %Winners | 36% | 37% | 47% | 51% | 43% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | |||
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | |||
| 1st in | 27/58 | 35/62 | 82/122 | 46/72 | 190/314 | |||
| % 1st in | 47% | 56% | 67% | 64% | 61% | |||
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 27/35 | 55/82 | 33/46 | 139/190 | |||
| % 1st pts | 89% | 77% | 67% | 72% | 73% | |||
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 13/27 | 22/40 | 15/26 | 67/124 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 48% | 55% | 58% | 54% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 13 | |||
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 | 2/10 | 3/3 | 13/27 | |||
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 20% | 100% | 48% | |||
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 26 | |||
| Saved | 3/4 | 4/5 | 10/11 | 5/6 | 22 | |||
| Saved % | 75% | 80% | 91% | 83% | 55% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWLL
WWWWWLLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
