Elmar Ejupovic and Paul Jubb will square off in the semifinal of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 1:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.32
Elmar Ejupovic -> 3.125
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elmar Ejupovic vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Elmar Ejupovic and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Elmar Ejupovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-27 | 7-5 | 19-12 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 30-34 | 4-7 | 16-17 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2022 | 46-28 | 4-2 | 32-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2021 | 34-25 | 1-2 | 23-17 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2020 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 10-3 |
Ranked no. 433, the German reached the semifinal after beating Benjamin Lock 7-5 6-4, Charles Broom 6-4 6-3 and Stuart Parker w/o.
In the quarter, Elmar defeated Parker (w/o). During the match, Ejupovic and Parker scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 433 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Ejupovic was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Talking about the service games, Ejupovic couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Elmar Ejupovic conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Elmar hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Ejupovic has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (307-228). 3-4 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ejupovic has an overall 62-49 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Elmar has an aggregate 3-5 win-loss record in 2024, 3-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 502, Jubb reached the semifinal after beating George Houghton 7-5 6-3, David Poljak 7-5 6-3, Francesco Maestrelli 6-4 5-7 6-3, Charlie Robertson 6-2 6-2 and Henry Searle 6-4 4-6 6-2.
In the quarter, Paul defeated Searle (6-4 4-6 6-2). During the match Jubb scored 92 points vs Searle’s 73. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Jubb bagged 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 82% (41/50) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Paul broke Searle 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Jubb’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger.
Jubb has an aggregate 12-5 win-loss record in 2024, 8-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ejupovic | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 12 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 117 |
| Pts | 129-108 | 407-323 |
| Total Points | 237 | 730 |
| Winners | 66 | 169 |
| %Winners | 51% | 42% |
Ejupovic played 2 matches while Jubb competed in 5 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while Ejupovic had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Paul Jubb conceded 2 sets while Elmar Ejupovic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ejupovic has played 8 set(s) less than Jubb (4 vs 12). Therefore, Ejupovic played 76 games less than Jubb. The German scored 66 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit managed to score 169 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ejupovic | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 35 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 80/119 | 212/324 |
| %1st in | 67% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 66/80 | 169/212 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 18/39 | 68/112 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 61% |
Ejupovic scored 11 aces (5.5 per match). Jubb blasted 35 aces (7 per match). Ejupovic won 83% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ejupovic | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 17 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 17/41 |
| % Converted | 43% | 41% |
| Conceded | 6 | 14 |
| Saved | 5 | 10 |
| % Saved | 83% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Ejupovic broke his opponents 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Ejupovic surrendered his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Jubb broke his opponents 17 times with a 41% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ejupovic | |||||
| R1 Lock |
R2 Broom |
1/4 Parker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 6-4 6-3 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | – | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 | – | 41 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 64-59 | – | 129-108 | |
| Total points | 114 | 123 | – | 237 | |
| Winners | 32 | 34 | – | 66 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 53% | – | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 4 | – | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | – | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/54 | 42/65 | – | 80/119 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 65% | – | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 34/42 | – | 66/80 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 81% | – | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 8/23 | – | 18/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 35% | – | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | – | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/10 | – | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 30% | – | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 | – | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 5/5 | – | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 100% | – | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | – | 1 | |
| Jubb | |||||||
| Q1 Houghton |
Q3 Poljak |
R1 Maestrelli |
R2 Robertson |
1/4 Searle |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | 31 | 16 | 28 | 117 | |
| pts | 72-53 | 67-54 | 108-97 | 68-46 | 92-73 | 407-323 | |
| Total points | 125 | 121 | 205 | 114 | 165 | 730 | |
| Winners | 28 | 34 | 42 | 24 | 41 | 169 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 51% | 39% | 35% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 11 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 40/56 | 57/91 | 31/54 | 50/70 | 212/324 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 71% | 63% | 57% | 71% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 34/40 | 42/57 | 24/31 | 41/50 | 169/212 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 85% | 74% | 77% | 82% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/19 | 9/16 | 19/34 | 13/23 | 11/20 | 68/112 | |
| % 2nd pts | 84% | 56% | 56% | 57% | 55% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 17 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 3/8 | 4/11 | 4/9 | 4/5 | 17/41 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 38% | 36% | 44% | 80% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 5/7 | 3/3 | 0/2 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 71% | 100% | 0% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWL
LLWLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Glasgow Challenger
- Stuart ParkerParker – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (w/o) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Henry SearleSearle (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Nicola KuhnKuhn (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Hamish StewartStewart (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Stuart ParkerParker (w/o) – See score progression
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Hamish StewartStewart (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Nicola KuhnKuhn (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Henry SearleSearle (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Stuart ParkerParker (w/o) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Paul JubbJubb – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
