Paul Jubb and Henry Searle will square off in the quarter of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
Paul Jubb -> 1.35
Henry Searle -> 2.97
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Henry Searle
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Henry Searle since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 502, the Brit reached the quarter after beating George Houghton 7-5 6-3, David Poljak 7-5 6-3, Francesco Maestrelli 6-4 5-7 6-3 and Charlie Robertson 6-2 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Robertson (6-2 6-2). During the match, Jubb scored 68 points vs Robertson’s 46. Paul was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jubb recorded 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Paul Jubb was very efficient on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Paul broke Robertson 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Paul started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Jubb has a fantastic match record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (180-76). 7-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jubb has a composed23-14 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Paul’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger.
Paul has a composed 11-5 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Henry Searle
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-26 | 7-7 | 3-5 | 10-9 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 10-10 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 874, Henry got to the quarter after beating Jiri Vesely 7-65 6-4 and Daniel Cox 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Henry had a good straight sets win against Cox (6-4 6-4). During the match Searle scored 63 points vs Cox’s 56. The Brit was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Searle fired 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Henry Searle was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (30/38) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Searle broke Cox twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
The Brit has a compiled 5-3 win-loss record in 2024, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Jubb | Searle |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 2 |
Tot Set | 9 | 4 |
Tot Games | 89 | 43 |
Pts | 315-250 | 128-118 |
Total Points | 565 | 246 |
Winners | 128 | 68 |
%Winners | 41% | 53% |
Jubb played 4 matches while Searle competed in 2 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while Searle had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set while Henry Searle hasn’t lost a set so far. Jubb has played 5 sets more than Searle (9 vs 4). Therefore, Jubb played 46 games more than Searle. Paul scored 128 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Henry bagged 68 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Jubb | Searle |
---|---|---|
Aces | 30 | 16 |
Avg per match | 7.5 | 8 |
1st in | 162/254 | 84/131 |
%1st in | 64% | 64% |
1st pts | 128/162 | 68/84 |
%1st pts | 79% | 81% |
2nd pts | 57/92 | 28/47 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 60% |
Jubb struck 30 aces (7.5 per match). Searle blasted 16 aces (8 per match). Jubb won 79% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Searle won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Jubb | Searle |
---|---|---|
Won | 13 | 3 |
Converted | 13/36 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 36% | 50% |
Conceded | 12 | 4 |
Saved | 10 | 4 |
% Saved | 83% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Brit broke his opponents 13 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Henry broke his opponents 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Henry was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
Jubb | ||||||
Q1 Houghton | Q3 Poljak | R1 Maestrelli | R2 Robertson | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | 31 | 16 | 89 | |
pts | 72-53 | 67-54 | 108-97 | 68-46 | 315-250 | |
Total points | 125 | 121 | 205 | 114 | 565 | |
Winners | 28 | 34 | 42 | 24 | 128 | |
%Winners | 39% | 51% | 39% | 35% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 11 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 30 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |
1st in | 34/53 | 40/56 | 57/91 | 31/54 | 162/254 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 71% | 63% | 57% | 64% | |
1st pts | 28/34 | 34/40 | 42/57 | 24/31 | 128/162 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 85% | 74% | 77% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 16/19 | 9/16 | 19/34 | 13/23 | 57/92 | |
% 2nd pts | 84% | 56% | 56% | 57% | 62% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
Converted | 2/8 | 3/8 | 4/11 | 4/9 | 13/36 | |
Converted % | 25% | 38% | 36% | 44% | 36% | |
Conceded | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 12 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 5/7 | 3/3 | 10 | |
Saved % | – | 100% | 71% | 100% | 68% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Searle | ||||||
R1 Vesely | R2 Cox | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||
Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 43 | |||
pts | 65-62 | 63-56 | 128-118 | |||
Total points | 127 | 119 | 246 | |||
Winners | 38 | 30 | 68 | |||
%Winners | 58% | 48% | 53% | |||
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 8 | 8 | 16 | |||
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |||
1st in | 46/69 | 38/62 | 84/131 | |||
% 1st in | 67% | 61% | 64% | |||
1st pts | 38/46 | 30/38 | 68/84 | |||
% 1st pts | 83% | 79% | 81% | |||
2nd pts | 13/23 | 15/24 | 28/47 | |||
% 2nd pts | 57% | 63% | 60% | |||
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Converted | 1/2 | 2/4 | 3/6 | |||
Converted % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
Saved | 3/3 | 1/1 | 4 | |||
Saved % | 100% | 100% | 50% | |||
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Stuart ParkerParker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Nicola KuhnKuhn (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction