Jannik Sinner and Milos Raonic will face off in the quarter of the ABN AMRO Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 10:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jannik Sinner who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jannik Sinner is the pick to win this match.
Jannik Sinner -> 1.08
Milos Raonic -> 7.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jannik Sinner vs. Milos Raonic
There is no head to head record between Jannik Sinner and Milos Raonic since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jannik Sinner
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-3 | 17-1 | 11-2 | 5-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 64-15 | 28-7 | 8-3 | 20-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-16 | 21-6 | 15-4 | 7-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-22 | 22-8 | 10-6 | 17-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-14 | 2-6 | 7-3 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 4 (career-high), Jannik reached the quarter after beating Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-3 6-3 and Gael Monfils 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Italian defeated Monfils (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match, Sinner scored 83 points vs Monfils’s 69. Jannik was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sinner fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jannik Sinner was pretty effective on serve to win 76% (37/49) of his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Sinner broke Monfils twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Sinner has dropped 1 set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Sinner has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 71% of his matches (282-113). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Sinner has an overall89-25 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title at the Australian Open where he overcame Daniil Medvedev in the final 3-6 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-3.
Sinner has a compiled 9-0 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rotterdam
Milos Raonic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 23-9 | 13-5 | 1-1 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 309, the Canadian got to the quarter after defeating Jesper De Jong 7-65 6-4 and Alexander Bublik 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Bublik (6-4 6-4). During the match Raonic scored 66 points vs Bublik’s 53. Raonic was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Raonic recorded 12 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Milos Raonic was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (28/33) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Raonic broke Bublik twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Milos hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Milos has a composed 2-1 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rotterdam
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2015. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sinner | Raonic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 43 |
| Pts | 151-119 | 142-122 |
| Total Points | 270 | 264 |
| Winners | 65 | 64 |
| %Winners | 43% | 45% |
Both Sinner and Raonic played 2 matches. At the moment, Jannik Sinner conceded 1 set while Milos Raonic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sinner has played 1 set more than Raonic (5 vs 4). Therefore, Sinner played 2 games more than Raonic. The Italian scored 65 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Canadian managed to score 64 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sinner | Raonic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 32 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 16 |
| 1st in | 81/119 | 70/120 |
| %1st in | 68% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 65/81 | 64/70 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 91% |
| 2nd pts | 26/38 | 29/50 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 58% |
Sinner struck 7 aces (3.5 per match). Raonic made 32 aces (16 per match). Sinner won 80% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Raonic won 91% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sinner | Raonic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 3/14 |
| % Converted | 38% | 21% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 75% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Sinner broke his opponents 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Italian dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Milos broke his opponents 3 times with a 21% conversion rate. Raonic was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Sinner | ||||
| R1 Van De Zandschulp |
R2 Monfils |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 45 | |
| pts | 68-50 | 83-69 | 151-119 | |
| Total points | 118 | 152 | 270 | |
| Winners | 28 | 37 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 45% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/47 | 49/72 | 81/119 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 37/49 | 65/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 76% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 17/23 | 26/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 74% | 68% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 2/5 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 40% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 0/1 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Raonic | ||||
| R1 De |
R2 Bublik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 43 | |
| pts | 76-69 | 66-53 | 142-122 | |
| Total points | 145 | 119 | 264 | |
| Winners | 36 | 28 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 42% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 20 | 12 | 32 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 37/66 | 33/54 | 70/120 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 61% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 36/37 | 28/33 | 64/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 97% | 85% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 14/21 | 29/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 67% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Converted | 1/8 | 2/6 | 3/14 | |
| Converted % | 13% | 33% | 21% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 3/3 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWWW
LWLWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Rotterdam
- Ivan Dodig/Austin KrajicekDodig/Austin Krajicek – Andreas Mies/John-Patrick SmithMies/John-Patrick Smith (4-6 6-4 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Sander Gille/Joran VliegenGille/Joran Vliegen (7-66 6-714 10-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Andrey RublevRublev (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Milos RaonicRaonic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
