Andrey Rublev and Felix Auger-Aliassime will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the ABN AMRO Open for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrey Rublev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andrey Rublev is the pick to win this match.
Andrey Rublev -> 1.52
Felix Auger-Aliassime -> 2.54
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrey Rublev vs. Felix Auger-Aliassime
This will be the 5th time that Andrey Rublev and Felix Auger-Aliassime fight against each other. The head to head is 3-1 for Rublev (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Rublev won 7-5 7-6(4) in the final in Marseille back in 2022.
Highlights Andrey Rublev vs Felix Auger-Aliassime – Marseille 20-February-2022
Andrey Rublev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-25 | 16-13 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-26 | 26-11 | 11-6 | 6-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-26 | 23-12 | 19-5 | 6-7 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-20 | 19-7 | 14-6 | 18-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 25-10 | 9-5 | 12-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 5 (career-high), Rublev got to the 2nd round after defeating Zizou Bergs 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Rublev had a good straight sets win against Bergs (7-5 6-3). During the match, Rublev scored 70 points vs Bergs’s 58. The Russian was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Rublev managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Andrey Rublev was extremely efficient on serve to win 72% (31/43) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Russian broke Bergs twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Rublev has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (399-221). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Rublev has an overall 116-63 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the season was conquering the title in Hong Kong where he overcame Emil Ruusuvuori in the final 6-4 6-4.
The Russian has a compiled 9-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rotterdam
Felix Auger-Aliassime
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 50-25 | 24-10 | 3-6 | 17-5 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-25 | 6-10 | 17-8 | 9-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-19 | 13-13 | 1-3 | 9-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 60-27 | 14-9 | 11-7 | 31-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-24 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 5-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 28, the Canadian got to the 2nd round after defeating Maxime Cressy 7-63 7-68.
In the 1st round, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Cressy (7-63 7-68). During the match Auger-Aliassime and Cressy scored the same amount of points (85). However, the world no. 5 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Auger-Aliassime was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Auger-Aliassime blasted 18 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Felix Auger-Aliassime was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (43/57) of his 1st serve and 64% (18/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
The Canadian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in Montpellier.
Auger-Aliassime has an aggregate 6-4 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rotterdam
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rublev | Auger-Aliassime |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 26 |
| Pts | 70-58 | 85-85 |
| Total Points | 128 | 170 |
| Winners | 31 | 43 |
| %Winners | 44% | 51% |
Both Rublev and Auger-Aliassime played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Rublev and Auger-Aliassime have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Rublev played 5 games less than Auger-Aliassime. Andrey scored 31 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Felix scored 43 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rublev | Auger-Aliassime |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 18 |
| 1st in | 43/68 | 57/85 |
| %1st in | 63% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 43/57 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 18/28 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 64% |
Rublev recorded 3 aces . Auger-Aliassime bagged 18 aces . Rublev won 72% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Auger-Aliassime won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rublev | Auger-Aliassime |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 0 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 0/5 |
| % Converted | 67% | 0% |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Andrey broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The Russian had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 3 break points. On the other side, The Canadian hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The Canadian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Rublev | |||
| R1 Bergs |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 70-58 | 70-58 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/68 | 43/68 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 17/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Auger-Aliassime | |||
| R1 Cressy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 85-85 | 85-85 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 57/85 | 57/85 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 43/57 | 43/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/28 | 18/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/5 | 0/5 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLLLWW
LWWLLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Rotterdam
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Ivan Dodig/Austin KrajicekDodig/Austin Krajicek – Harri Heliovaara/John PeersHeliovaara/John Peers (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Alexander BublikBublik – Borna CoricCoric (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (6-3 6-79 7-69) – See score progression
- Andreas Mies/John-Patrick SmithMies/John-Patrick Smith – Lloyd Glasspool/Jean-Julien RojerGlasspool/Jean-Julien Rojer (6-75 7-62 11-9) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Sebastian KordaKorda (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (4-6 7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Zizou BergsBergs (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (3-6 7-67 7-63) – See score progression
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Albano Olivetti/Michael VenusOlivetti/Michael Venus (6-3 6-75 10-6) – See score progression
- Milos RaonicRaonic – Jesper De JongDe Jong (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- David GoffinGoffin – Dino PrizmicPrizmic (6-4 6-712 6-1) – See score progression
- Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime – Maxime CressyCressy (7-63 7-68) – See score progression
- Robin Haase/Botic Van de ZandschulpHaase/Botic Van de Zandschulp – Kevin Krawietz/Tim PuetzKrawietz/Tim Puetz (7-67 6-75 10-5) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (6-3 6-7(9) 7-6(9)) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Zizou BergsBergs (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Milos RaonicRaonic – Alexander BublikBublik (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Gael MonfilsMonfils (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Ugo HumbertHumbert (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – David GoffinGoffin (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Andrey RublevRublev (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-0) – H2H and prediction
