Hazem Naow and Adrien Gobat will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Cherbourg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on JEAN JAURES. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hazem Naow who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hazem Naow is the pick to win this match.
Hazem Naow -> 1.143
Adrien Gobat -> 5.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hazem Naow vs. Adrien Gobat
There is no head to head record between Hazem Naow and Adrien Gobat since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 369 (career-high), Naow got to the qualifications after defeating Alexey Vatutin 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications, Naow had a good straight sets win against Vatutin (7-5 6-1). During the match, Naow scored 69 points vs Vatutin’s 54. Hazem was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Naow struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Hazem Naow was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (35/47) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Syrian broke Vatutin 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Naow has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (138-70). 6-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Naow has an aggregate9-4 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The Syrian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island.
The Syrian has an aggregate 16-3 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cherbourg Challenger
Naow has never competed in this tournament before.
Adrien Gobat
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-14 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 47-24 | 34-12 | 4-3 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 16-10 | 2-2 | 11-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-11 | 4-2 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 554, Gobat reached the qualifications after beating Kenny de Schepper 7-67 7-62.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against de Schepper (7-67 7-62). During the match Gobat scored 94 points vs de Schepper’s 92. The French player was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Gobat made 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Adrien Gobat was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (36/49) of his 1st serve and 53% (31/58) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Adrien broke de Schepper twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Adrien’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Monastir.
The French player has a composed 4-4 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Naow | Gobat |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 26 |
| Pts | 69-54 | 94-92 |
| Total Points | 123 | 186 |
| Winners | 35 | 36 |
| %Winners | 51% | 38% |
Both Naow and Gobat played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Naow and Gobat have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Naow played 7 games less than Gobat. Hazem scored 35 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Adrien fired 36 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Naow | Gobat |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 47/64 | 49/107 |
| %1st in | 73% | 46% |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 36/49 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 31/58 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 53% |
Naow recorded 5 aces . Gobat struck 4 aces . Naow won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Gobat won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Naow | Gobat |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 57% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Naow broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Hazem was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 4 break points. Gobat broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Gobat conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Naow | |||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 69-54 | 69-54 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 47/64 | 47/64 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Gobat | |||
| Q1 de Schepper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 94-92 | 94-92 | |
| Total points | 186 | 186 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 49/107 | 49/107 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 36/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 31/58 | 31/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – Lucas PoullainPoullain (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Jules MarieMarie (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Michael GeertsGeerts (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Adrien GobatGobat (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Florent BaxBax – Nikolay VylegzhaninVylegzhanin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo RottoliRottoli – Cyril VandermeerschVandermeersch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
