Daniel Cox and Leonardo Rossi will square off in the qualifications of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 8. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Cox who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Cox -> 1.533
Leonardo Rossi -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Cox vs. Leonardo Rossi
There is no head to head record between Daniel Cox and Leonardo Rossi since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Daniel Cox
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-27 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-20 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 16-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-6 | 23-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 462, the Brit reached the qualifications after defeating Andrea Guerrieri 0-6 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Guerrieri, Daniel recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 7-5 6-3). During the match, Cox scored 89 points vs Guerrieri’s 86. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cox blasted 3 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Daniel Cox lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Cox put 61% of his first serves in, winning 64% (29/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. Cox broke Guerrieri 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Cox has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (169-96). 8-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cox has an overall 53-28 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit has a compiled 8-3 win-loss record in 2024, 8-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Cox has never competed in this tournament before.
Leonardo Rossi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-16 | 7-4 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 40-29 | 26-14 | 14-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 50-26 | 47-20 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-13 | 0-1 | 11-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 721, Rossi reached the qualifications after defeating Jacopo Berrettini 7-61 7-66.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Berrettini (7-61 7-66). During the match Rossi scored 91 points vs Berrettini’s 82. Rossi was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Rossi struck 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Leonardo Rossi lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Rossi put 55% of his first serves in, winning 65% (32/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (22/40) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Berrettini 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Rossi has an overall 1-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cox | Rossi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 26 |
| Pts | 89-86 | 91-82 |
| Total Points | 175 | 173 |
| Winners | 29 | 32 |
| %Winners | 33% | 35% |
Both Cox and Rossi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Cox dropped 1 set while Leonardo Rossi hasn’t lost a set so far. Cox has played 1 set more than Rossi (3 vs 2). Therefore, Cox played 1 game more than Rossi. Daniel scored 29 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian made 32 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cox | Rossi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 45/74 | 49/89 |
| %1st in | 61% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 32/49 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 22/40 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 55% |
Cox struck 3 aces . Rossi blasted 4 aces . Cox won 64% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Rossi won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cox | Rossi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 25% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 11 |
| Saved | 3 | 8 |
| % Saved | 43% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Daniel broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Daniel dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. Rossi broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Leonardo conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cox | |||
| Q1 Guerrieri | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 0-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 89-86 | 89-86 | |
| Total points | 175 | 175 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/74 | 45/74 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Rossi | |||
| Q1 Berrettini | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 91-82 | 91-82 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 49/89 | 49/89 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 32/49 | 32/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel CoxCox – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PoljakPoljak – Paul JubbJubb (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Hamish StewartStewart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Aidan MchughMchugh (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Alex KnaffKnaff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction