Paul Jubb and David Poljak will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Glasgow Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.26
David Poljak -> 3.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. David Poljak
This will be the 2nd time that Paul Jubb and David Poljak play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Poljak (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Poljak won 6-3 6-2 in the 2nd round in M15 Sharm El Sheikh back in 2021.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 521, the Brit got to the qualifications after beating George Houghton 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Paul had a good straight sets win against Houghton (7-5 6-3). During the match, Jubb scored 72 points vs Houghton’s 53. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jubb blasted 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Paul Jubb was quite effective on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 84% (16/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jubb broke Houghton twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Jubb has a fantastic match record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (177-76). 4-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jubb has a composed20-14 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Paul’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger.
The Brit has an aggregate 8-5 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Paul has never competed in this tournament before.
David Poljak
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-20 | 3-2 | 5-5 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 10-15 | 7-11 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 6-4 | 8-10 | 25-15 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 38-28 | 15-12 | 12-12 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 16-7 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 895, David reached the qualifications after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Kirchheimer, The Czech recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Poljak scored 95 points vs Kirchheimer’s 89. David was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Poljak blasted 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, David Poljak was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (38/51) of his 1st serve and 62% (26/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. David broke Kirchheimer twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
The Czech has a compiled 3-3 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 29 |
| Pts | 72-53 | 95-89 |
| Total Points | 125 | 184 |
| Winners | 28 | 38 |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% |
Both Jubb and Poljak played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, David Poljak dropped 1 set while Paul Jubb hasn’t lost a set so far. Jubb has played 1 set(s) less than Poljak (2 vs 3). Therefore, Jubb played 8 games less than Poljak. The Brit scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech managed to score 38 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 5 |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 51/93 |
| %1st in | 64% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 38/51 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 16/19 | 26/42 |
| %2nd pts | 84% | 62% |
Jubb made 11 aces . Poljak scored 5 aces . Jubb won 82% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 84% of the points. On the other side, Poljak won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 |
| % Converted | 25% | 25% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Paul broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Jubb quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Czech broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. David conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | |||
| Q1 Houghton |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-53 | 72-53 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 34/53 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/19 | 16/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 84% | 84% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Poljak | |||
| Q1 Kirchheimer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 95-89 | 95-89 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 51/93 | 51/93 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 38/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWLL
LLWWWLLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel CoxCox – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PoljakPoljak – Paul JubbJubb (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Hamish StewartStewart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Aidan MchughMchugh (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Alex KnaffKnaff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
