Adam Walton and Dane Sweeny will clash against each other in the final of the Burnie 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adam Walton is the pick to win this match.
Adam Walton -> 1.76
Dane Sweeny -> 1.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Dane Sweeny
This will be the 2nd time that Adam Walton and Dane Sweeny face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Sweeny (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Sweeny won 7-6(4) 6-7(8) 7-6(5) in the semifinal in M25 Darwin back in 2022.
Adam Walton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 54-37 | 46-27 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 180, Walton reached the final after defeating Jacob Bradshaw 7-5 6-3, Andre Ilagan 6-2 6-73 6-3, Philip Sekulic 6-2 1-6 7-62 and Tristan Schoolkate 6-4 6-4.
In the semifinal, Adam had a good straight sets win against Schoolkate (6-4 6-4). During the match, Walton scored 65 points vs Schoolkate’s 52. Walton was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Walton fired 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Adam Walton was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (30/38) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Walton broke Schoolkate 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Adam has dropped 2 set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
Walton has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 68% of his matches (115-55). 7-4 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Walton has a compiled110-46 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Walton’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Burnie 2 Challenger.
The Australian has a compiled 7-4 win-loss record in 2024, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 2 Challenger
Dane Sweeny
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-25 | 18-18 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-33 | 25-23 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 62-26 | 59-22 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-23 | 19-15 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 5-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 224 (career-high), Dane got to the final after defeating Rio Noguchi 6-4 6-4, Makoto Ochi 6-3 4-6 6-2, James McCabe 6-1 2-6 6-4 and Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-2 3-1 ret..
In the semifinal against Uchiyama, Sweeny had a free pass after Uchiyama retired on a 6-2 3-1 . scoreline.
The Australian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Burnie 2 Challenger.
Sweeny has a composed 9-3 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 99 | 84 |
| Pts | 334-283 | 287-246 |
| Total Points | 617 | 533 |
| Winners | 149 | 123 |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% |
Both Walton and Sweeny played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Adam Walton conceded 2 sets, while Dane Sweeny conceded 2 sets. Walton has played 1 set(s) less than Sweeny (10 vs 11). However, it’s interesting to notice that Walton played 15 games more than Sweeny. Walton scored 149 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Sweeny bagged 123 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 28 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 0.8 |
| 1st in | 196/313 | 190/278 |
| %1st in | 63% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 149/196 | 123/190 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 62/117 | 52/88 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 59% |
Walton blasted 28 aces (7 per match). Sweeny blasted 3 aces (0.8 per match). Walton won 76% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Sweeny won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 16 |
| Converted | 13/27 | 16/31 |
| % Converted | 48% | 52% |
| Conceded | 23 | 26 |
| Saved | 17 | 19 |
| % Saved | 74% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 7 |
Walton broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. Adam dropped his serve 6 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded. Sweeny broke his opponents 16 times with a 52% conversion rate. Dane conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | ||||||
| R1 Bradshaw |
R2 Ilagan |
1/4 Sekulic |
1/2 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-2 6-73 6-3 | 6-2 1-6 7-62 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 30 | 28 | 20 | 99 | |
| pts | 68-56 | 108-93 | 93-82 | 65-52 | 334-283 | |
| Total points | 124 | 201 | 175 | 117 | 617 | |
| Winners | 30 | 54 | 35 | 30 | 149 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 50% | 38% | 46% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 36/63 | 72/113 | 50/81 | 38/56 | 196/313 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 64% | 62% | 68% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/36 | 54/72 | 35/50 | 30/38 | 149/196 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 75% | 70% | 79% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 21/41 | 20/31 | 10/18 | 62/117 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 51% | 65% | 56% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/7 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 13/27 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 43% | 50% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 23 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 5/5 | 6/9 | 4/5 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 67% | 80% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| Sweeny | ||||||
| R1 Noguchi |
R2 Ochi |
1/4 McCabe |
1/2 Uchiyama |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | 6-2 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 27 | 25 | 12 | 84 | |
| pts | 69-61 | 92-81 | 76-70 | 50-34 | 287-246 | |
| Total points | 130 | 173 | 146 | 84 | 533 | |
| Winners | 31 | 40 | 31 | 21 | 123 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% | 41% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 49/68 | 62/96 | 50/74 | 29/40 | 190/278 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 65% | 68% | 73% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 31/49 | 40/62 | 31/50 | 21/29 | 123/190 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 65% | 62% | 72% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 18/34 | 14/24 | 8/11 | 52/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 53% | 58% | 73% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 16 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 5/11 | 5/8 | 3/6 | 16/31 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 45% | 63% | 50% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 26 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 9/12 | 4/7 | 1/1 | 19 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 75% | 57% | 100% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWWLWW
LLLWWLLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adam WaltonWalton – Dane SweenySweeny (0-1) – H2H and prediction
