Adam Walton and Tristan Schoolkate will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Burnie 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 3 sets.
Adam Walton -> 1.63
Tristan Schoolkate -> 2.16
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Tristan Schoolkate
This will be the 3rd time that Adam Walton and Tristan Schoolkate clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Walton won 6-4 7-5 in the semifinal in the Tiburon Challenger back in 2023.
Adam Walton
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 42-28 | 38-21 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 180, Walton reached the semifinal after beating Jacob Bradshaw 7-5 6-3, Andre Ilagan 6-2 6-73 6-3 and Philip Sekulic 6-2 1-6 7-62.
In the quarter, Adam defeated Sekulic (6-2 1-6 7-62). During the match, Walton scored 93 points vs Sekulic’s 82. Adam was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Walton recorded 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Adam Walton lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Walton put 62% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (20/31) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Sekulic 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has conceded 2 set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
Walton has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (114-55). 6-4 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Walton has an aggregate109-46 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Australian has an overall 6-4 win-loss record in 2024, 6-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 2 Challenger
Tristan Schoolkate
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-24 | 27-17 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 264, Schoolkate got to the semifinal after beating Jake Delaney 6-3 6-2, Omar Jasika 6-2 6-3 and Li Tu 7-64 6-4.
In the quarter, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Tu (7-64 6-4). During the match Schoolkate scored 85 points vs Tu’s 74. Tristan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Schoolkate struck 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate was quite efficient on serve to win 80% (41/51) of his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Schoolkate broke Tu once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Schoolkate hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Schoolkate has an aggregate 6-3 win-loss record in 2024, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Walton | Schoolkate |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 8 | 6 |
Tot Games | 79 | 57 |
Pts | 269-231 | 215-175 |
Total Points | 500 | 390 |
Winners | 119 | 78 |
%Winners | 44% | 36% |
Both Walton and Schoolkate played 3 matches. At the moment, Adam Walton lost 2 sets while Tristan Schoolkate hasn’t dropped a set so far. Walton has played 2 sets more than Schoolkate (8 vs 6). Therefore, Walton played 22 games more than Schoolkate. Adam scored 119 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Schoolkate fired 78 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Walton | Schoolkate |
---|---|---|
Aces | 21 | 25 |
Avg per match | 7 | 8.3 |
1st in | 158/257 | 102/185 |
%1st in | 61% | 55% |
1st pts | 119/158 | 78/102 |
%1st pts | 75% | 76% |
2nd pts | 52/99 | 49/83 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 59% |
Walton made 21 aces (7 per match). Schoolkate fired 25 aces (8.3 per match). Walton won 75% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Schoolkate won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Walton | Schoolkate |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 9 |
Converted | 10/21 | 9/24 |
% Converted | 48% | 38% |
Conceded | 18 | 8 |
Saved | 13 | 7 |
% Saved | 72% | 88% |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Adam broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. Adam surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded. Schoolkate broke his opponents 9 times with a 38% conversion rate. Schoolkate conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
Walton | |||||
R1 Bradshaw | R2 Ilagan | 1/4 Sekulic | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-2 6-73 6-3 | 6-2 1-6 7-62 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 30 | 28 | 79 | |
pts | 68-56 | 108-93 | 93-82 | 269-231 | |
Total points | 124 | 201 | 175 | 500 | |
Winners | 30 | 54 | 35 | 119 | |
%Winners | 44% | 50% | 38% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 12 | 3 | 21 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
1st in | 36/63 | 72/113 | 50/81 | 158/257 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 64% | 62% | 61% | |
1st pts | 30/36 | 54/72 | 35/50 | 119/158 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 75% | 70% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 11/27 | 21/41 | 20/31 | 52/99 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 51% | 65% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 3/7 | 3/6 | 10/21 | |
Converted % | 50% | 43% | 50% | 48% | |
Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | 18 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 5/5 | 6/9 | 13 | |
Saved % | 50% | 100% | 67% | 72% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Schoolkate | |||||
R1 Delaney | R2 Jasika | 1/4 Tu | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-3 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 23 | 57 | |
pts | 57-44 | 73-57 | 85-74 | 215-175 | |
Total points | 101 | 130 | 159 | 390 | |
Winners | 17 | 20 | 41 | 78 | |
%Winners | 30% | 27% | 48% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 9 | 8 | 8 | 25 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | |
1st in | 25/56 | 26/47 | 51/82 | 102/185 | |
% 1st in | 45% | 55% | 62% | 55% | |
1st pts | 17/25 | 20/26 | 41/51 | 78/102 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 77% | 80% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 22/31 | 11/21 | 16/31 | 49/83 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 52% | 52% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 5 | 1 | 9 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 5/15 | 1/6 | 9/24 | |
Converted % | 100% | 33% | 17% | 38% | |
Conceded | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 1/2 | 3/3 | 7 | |
Saved % | 100% | 50% | 100% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Tennis Scores in Burnie 2 Challenger
- Adam WaltonWalton – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-2 1-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Li TuTu (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – James McCabeMcCabe (6-1 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Blake Bayldon/Kody PearsonBayldon/Kody Pearson – Matthew Christopher Romios/Brandon WalkinChristopher Romios/Brandon Walkin (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex Bolt/Luke SavilleBolt/Luke Saville – Jayden Court/Andre IlaganCourt/Andre Ilagan (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adam WaltonWalton – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-1) – H2H and prediction