Dane Sweeny and James McCabe will clash against each other in the quarter of the Burnie 2 Challenger for the 7^th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 2:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dane Sweeny who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Dane Sweeny is the pick to win this match.
Dane Sweeny -> 1.615
James McCabe -> 2.18

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Dane Sweeny vs. James McCabe

This will be the 7^th time that Dane Sweeny and James McCabe clash against each other. The head to head is 4-2 for Sweeny (see full H2H stats), 4-2 on hard.

The last time that they fought against each other, McCabe won 6-4 6-2 in the 2^nd round in the Granby Challenger back in 2023.

Dane Sweeny

Ranked no. 224 (career-high), Dane reached the quarter after beating Rio Noguchi 6-4 6-4 and Makoto Ochi 6-3 4-6 6-2.

In the 2^nd round, Dane defeated Ochi (6-3 4-6 6-2). During the match, Sweeny scored 92 points vs Ochi’s 81. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.

Regarding the service games, Sweeny scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Dane Sweeny lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Sweeny put 65% of his first serves in, winning 65% (40/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Ochi 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Sweeny has surrendered 1 set in this competition to conquer 53% of the points he played.

Sweeny has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (151-109). 7-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sweeny has a compiled125-76 match record in the last 7 years on hard.

Sweeny has a composed 7-3 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Burnie 2 Challenger

James McCabe

Ranked no. 276, James reached the quarter after beating Blake Ellis 6-4 6-4 and Luke Saville 6-4 6-4.

In the 2^nd round, James had a good straight sets win against Saville (6-4 6-4). During the match McCabe scored 62 points vs Saville’s 49. McCabe was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.

Talking about serving, McCabe made 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. James McCabe was extremely effective on serve to win 88% (28/32) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. McCabe broke Saville twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).

Overall Performance in this tournament

James hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.

McCabe has a composed 4-5 win-loss record in 2024, 4-5 on hard (See FULL STATS)

.

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Sweeny	McCabe
Match played	2	2
Tot Set	5	4
Tot Games	47	40
Pts	161-142	120-93
Total Points	303	213
Winners	71	55
%Winners	44%	46%

Both Sweeny and McCabe played 2 matches. At the moment, Dane Sweeny surrendered 1 set while James McCabe hasn’t lost a set so far. Sweeny has played 1 set more than McCabe (5 vs 4). Therefore, Sweeny played 7 games more than McCabe. Dane scored 71 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian recorded 55 winners (46%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Sweeny	McCabe
Aces	1	17
Avg per match	0.5	8.5
1st in	111/164	62/99
%1st in	68%	63%
1st pts	71/111	55/62
%1st pts	64%	89%
2nd pts	30/53	23/37
%2nd pts	57%	62%

Sweeny made 1 ace (0.5 per match). McCabe also recorded 17 aces (8.5 per match). Sweeny won 64% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, McCabe won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Sweeny	McCabe
Won	8	5
Converted	8/17	5/14
% Converted	47%	36%
Conceded	18	1
Saved	14	0
% Saved	78%	0%
Times Broken	4	1

Sweeny broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. McCabe broke his opponents 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. James conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.

Sweeny
	R1 Noguchi	R2 Ochi	Total
Score	6-4 6-4	6-3 4-6 6-2
Tot Set	2	3	5
Tot Games	20	27	47
pts	69-61	92-81	161-142
Total points	130	173	303
Winners	31	40	71
%Winners	45%	43%	44%
SERVE
Aces	0	1	1
Double Faults	0	4	4
1st in	49/68	62/96	111/164
% 1st in	72%	65%	68%
1st pts	31/49	40/62	71/111
% 1st pts	63%	65%	64%
2nd pts	12/19	18/34	30/53
% 2nd pts	63%	53%	57%
Breaks
Won	3	5	8
Converted	3/6	5/11	8/17
Converted %	50%	45%	47%
Conceded	6	12	18
Saved	5/6	9/12	14
Saved %	83%	75%	79%
Times Broken	1	3	4

McCabe
	R1 Ellis	R2 Saville	Total
Score	6-4 6-4	6-4 6-4
Tot Set	2	2	4
Tot Games	20	20	40
pts	58-44	62-49	120-93
Total points	102	111	213
Winners	27	28	55
%Winners	47%	45%	46%
SERVE
Aces	9	8	17
Double Faults	2	1	3
1st in	30/47	32/52	62/99
% 1st in	64%	62%	63%
1st pts	27/30	28/32	55/62
% 1st pts	90%	88%	89%
2nd pts	10/17	13/20	23/37
% 2nd pts	59%	65%	62%
Breaks
Won	3	2	5
Converted	3/6	2/8	5/14
Converted %	50%	25%	36%
Conceded	1	0	1
Saved	0/1	0/0	0
Saved %	0%	–	0%
Times Broken	1	0	1

Tennis Scores in Burnie 2 Challenger

• Blake Bayldon/Kody PearsonBayldon/Kody Pearson – Matthew Christopher Romios/Brandon WalkinChristopher Romios/Brandon Walkin (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Li TuTu – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction