Adam Walton and Andre Ilagan will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Burnie 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adam Walton is the pick to win this match.
Adam Walton -> 1.49
Andre Ilagan -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Andre Ilagan
There is no head to head record between Adam Walton and Andre Ilagan since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Adam Walton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-20 | 36-14 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 180, the Australian got to the 2nd round after defeating Jacob Bradshaw 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Adam had a good straight sets win against Bradshaw (7-5 6-3). During the match, Walton scored 68 points vs Bradshaw’s 56. Walton was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Walton made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Adam Walton lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Walton put 57% of his first serves in, winning 83% (30/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Bradshaw 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Walton has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (112-55). 4-4 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Walton has a compiled107-46 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Walton has an overall 4-4 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 2 Challenger
Andre Ilagan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-15 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-6 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 564 (career-high), the American got to the 2nd round after beating Mitchell Harper 6-4 7-5, Corey Gaal 6-4 6-3 and Calum Puttergill 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Ilagan defeated Puttergill (6-4 3-6 6-3).During the match Ilagan scored less points (1) than Puttergill. In fact, the world no. 180 won 88 points vs Puttergill’s. That means that Ilagan was more focused during the important points. The American was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Ilagan managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Andre Ilagan lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ilagan put 70% of his first serves in, winning 67% (39/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Ilagan broke Puttergill 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Ilagan’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger.
Andre has an overall 8-2 win-loss record in 2024, 8-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 69 |
| Pts | 68-56 | 230-203 |
| Total Points | 124 | 433 |
| Winners | 30 | 93 |
| %Winners | 44% | 40% |
Walton played 1 match while Ilagan competed in 3 matches. Ilagan started his run from the qualifications while Walton had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Andre Ilagan dropped 1 set while Adam Walton hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Walton has played 5 set(s) less than Ilagan (2 vs 7). Therefore, Walton played 48 games less than Ilagan. Adam scored 30 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 93 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 36/63 | 126/192 |
| %1st in | 57% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 30/36 | 93/126 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 36/66 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 55% |
Walton made 6 aces . Ilagan bagged 13 aces (4.3 per match). Walton won 83% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Ilagan won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 12/28 |
| % Converted | 50% | 43% |
| Conceded | 4 | 11 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 45% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Adam dropped his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | |||
| R1 Bradshaw |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 68-56 | 68-56 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 36/63 | 36/63 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 30/36 | 30/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 11/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Ilagan | |||||
| Q1 Harper |
Q3 Gaal |
R1 Puttergill |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 | 28 | 69 | |
| pts | 73-61 | 69-53 | 88-89 | 230-203 | |
| Total points | 134 | 122 | 177 | 433 | |
| Winners | 32 | 22 | 39 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 32% | 44% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 2 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/60 | 28/49 | 58/83 | 126/192 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 57% | 70% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 32/40 | 22/28 | 39/58 | 93/126 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 79% | 67% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 13/21 | 11/25 | 36/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 62% | 44% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/9 | 5/10 | 12/28 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 44% | 50% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/2 | 2/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 33% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLLWW
LLWWLWLWLW Tennis Scores in Burnie 2 Challenger
- Matthew HulmeHulme – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Alex BoltBolt (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Takuya KumasakaKumasaka (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Jacob BradshawBradshaw (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Makoto OchiOchi – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Jake DelaneyDelaney (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Hayden JonesJones (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Blake EllisEllis (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (6-1 6-73 6-3) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Maxime ChazalChazal (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Hayden JonesJones (6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Makoto OchiOchi – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Takuya KumasakaKumasaka (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Alex BoltBolt (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Matthew HulmeHulme (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
