Jacob Bradshaw and Masamichi Imamura will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Burnie 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Masamichi Imamura who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Masamichi Imamura is the pick to win this match.
Masamichi Imamura -> 1.76
Jacob Bradshaw -> 1.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jacob Bradshaw vs. Masamichi Imamura
There is no head to head record between Jacob Bradshaw and Masamichi Imamura since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jacob Bradshaw
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-26 | 33-25 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-36 | 48-35 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-24 | 40-19 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 666, Jacob reached the qualifications after beating Naoki Tajima 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Bradshaw had a good straight sets win against Tajima (6-4 6-4). During the match, Bradshaw scored 59 points vs Tajima’s 47. Bradshaw was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bradshaw struck 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jacob Bradshaw was exceptionally effective on serve to win 87% (27/31) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jacob broke Tajima twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Bradshaw has a solid record in the last 3 years having won 60% of his matches (93-63). 1-3 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Bradshaw has an aggregate89-57 record in the last 3 years on hard.
Jacob has an aggregate 1-3 win-loss record in 2024, 1-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 2 Challenger
Masamichi Imamura
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 56-28 | 48-24 | 2-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-26 | 36-23 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-15 | 24-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 894, the Japanese got to the qualifications after defeating Kody Pearson 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Pearson (6-2 6-0). During the match Imamura scored 55 points vs Pearson’s 28. Masamichi was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Imamura scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Masamichi Imamura was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 73% (8/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Imamura broke Pearson 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Japanese has an aggregate 4-3 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bradshaw | Imamura |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 14 |
| Pts | 59-47 | 55-28 |
| Total Points | 106 | 83 |
| Winners | 27 | 21 |
| %Winners | 46% | 38% |
Both Bradshaw and Imamura played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Bradshaw and Imamura have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Bradshaw played 6 games more than Imamura. Jacob scored 27 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Imamura recorded 21 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bradshaw | Imamura |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 1 |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 27/38 |
| %1st in | 62% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 27/31 | 21/27 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 8/11 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 73% |
Bradshaw recorded 10 aces . Imamura managed to score 1 ace . Bradshaw won 87% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Imamura won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 73% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bradshaw | Imamura |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 67% | 56% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The Australian had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Japanese broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Japanese was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Bradshaw | |||
| Q1 Tajima |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 59-47 | 59-47 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 31/50 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/31 | 27/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Imamura | |||
| Q1 Pearson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 55-28 | 55-28 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/38 | 27/38 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 8/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWL
LWLWLLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime ChazalChazal – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Blake MottMott (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Dane SweenySweeny (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Seita WatanabeWatanabe (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Corey GaalGaal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Takuya KumasakaKumasaka – Alexander KlintcharovKlintcharov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taisei IchikawaIchikawa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
