Corey Gaal and Andre Ilagan will play each other in the qualifications of the Burnie 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andre Ilagan who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andre Ilagan is the pick to win this match.
Andre Ilagan -> 1.112
Corey Gaal -> 5.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Corey Gaal vs. Andre Ilagan
There is no head to head record between Corey Gaal and Andre Ilagan since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Corey Gaal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-26 | 12-10 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 14-15 | 12-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Corey got to the qualifications after defeating Brandon Walkin 7-65 6-0.
In the qualifications, Corey had a good straight sets win against Walkin (7-65 6-0). During the match, Gaal scored 76 points vs Walkin’s 57. Corey was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaal scored 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Corey Gaal lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Gaal put 63% of his first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Walkin 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Gaal has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 52% of his matches (45-42). 2-1 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gaal has a composed26-24 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Australian has an overall 2-1 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 2 Challenger
Andre Ilagan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-15 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-6 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 565 (career-high), the American got to the qualifications after defeating Mitchell Harper 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, Ilagan had a good straight sets win against Harper (6-4 7-5). During the match Ilagan scored 73 points vs Harper’s 61. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Ilagan recorded 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Andre Ilagan was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 80% (32/40) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Ilagan broke Harper 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Ilagan’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger.
Andre has an aggregate 6-2 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaal | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 |
| Pts | 76-57 | 73-61 |
| Total Points | 133 | 134 |
| Winners | 29 | 32 |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both Gaal and Ilagan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gaal and Ilagan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gaal played 3 games less than Ilagan. The Australian scored 29 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Andre bagged 32 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaal | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 5 |
| 1st in | 39/62 | 40/60 |
| %1st in | 63% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 32/40 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 12/20 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 60% |
Gaal struck 10 aces . Ilagan made 5 aces . Gaal won 74% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Ilagan won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaal | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 42% | 33% |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Corey broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Corey lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Andre broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Andre conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gaal | |||
| Q1 Walkin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 76-57 | 76-57 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/62 | 39/62 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Ilagan | |||
| Q1 Harper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-61 | 73-61 | |
| Total points | 134 | 134 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/60 | 40/60 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 32/40 | 32/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLW
LLWWLWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime ChazalChazal – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Blake MottMott (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Dane SweenySweeny (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Seita WatanabeWatanabe (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Corey GaalGaal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Takuya KumasakaKumasaka – Alexander KlintcharovKlintcharov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taisei IchikawaIchikawa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
