Denis Kudla and Ethan Quinn will play each other in the semifinal of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Denis Kudla who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Denis Kudla is the pick to win this match.
Denis Kudla -> 1.59
Ethan Quinn -> 2.23
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Denis Kudla vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Denis Kudla and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Denis Kudla
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-23 | 9-7 | 6-6 | 7-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-28 | 13-17 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-33 | 21-19 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 7-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-27 | 20-14 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 12-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-9 | 13-6 | 0-1 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 182, Kudla got to the semifinal after defeating Keegan Smith 1-6 6-4 6-4, Noah Rubin 6-1 6-3 and Tennys Sandgren 6-4 5-7 6-2.
In the quarter, Kudla defeated Sandgren (6-4 5-7 6-2). During the match, Kudla scored 100 points vs Sandgren’s 80. Kudla was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kudla scored 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Denis Kudla was very efficient on serve to win 88% (38/43) of his 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Kudla broke Sandgren 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kudla has surrendered 2 set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.
Kudla has positive record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (307-249). 3-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kudla has a compiled 64-39 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Denis has an overall 4-1 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 337, Ethan reached the semifinal after defeating Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-3, Stefan Kozlov 6-2 4-6 6-3 and Thai Kwiatkowski 7-67 5-7 6-4.
In the quarter, Ethan defeated Kwiatkowski (7-67 5-7 6-4). During the match Quinn and Kwiatkowski scored the same amount of points (120). However, the world no. 182 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The American was quite aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Talking about serving, Quinn recorded 16 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 62% of his first serves in, winning 71% (55/78) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (23/47) on the 2nd serve. Ethan broke Kwiatkowski 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Quinn has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Quinn has a compiled 4-3 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kudla | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 73 | 80 |
| Pts | 235-191 | 293-261 |
| Total Points | 426 | 554 |
| Winners | 101 | 119 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Both Kudla and Quinn played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Denis Kudla dropped 2 sets, while Ethan Quinn surrendered 2 sets. Talking about their workload, Kudla and Quinn have played the same amount of sets 8. However, Kudla played 7 games less than Quinn. Denis scored 101 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Ethan made 119 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kudla | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 27 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 7 |
| 1st in | 121/196 | 161/271 |
| %1st in | 62% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 101/121 | 119/161 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 40/75 | 60/110 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 55% |
Kudla blasted 27 aces (9 per match). Quinn managed to score 21 aces (7 per match). Kudla won 83% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kudla | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 10 |
| Converted | 11/26 | 10/30 |
| % Converted | 42% | 33% |
| Conceded | 15 | 22 |
| Saved | 9 | 17 |
| % Saved | 60% | 77% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 5 |
Denis broke his opponents 11 times with a 42% conversion rate. The American lost his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Ethan broke his opponents 10 times with a 33% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kudla | |||||
| R1 Smith |
R2 Rubin |
1/4 Sandgren |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 16 | 30 | 73 | |
| pts | 79-76 | 56-35 | 100-80 | 235-191 | |
| Total points | 155 | 91 | 180 | 426 | |
| Winners | 38 | 25 | 38 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 45% | 38% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 6 | 13 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 51/80 | 27/42 | 43/74 | 121/196 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | 58% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 38/51 | 25/27 | 38/43 | 101/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 93% | 88% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 8/15 | 18/31 | 40/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 53% | 58% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/8 | 4/10 | 11/26 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 50% | 40% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 0 | 4 | 15 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 0/0 | 2/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 64% | – | 50% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | |
| Quinn | |||||
| R1 Mayo |
R2 Kozlov |
1/4 Kwiatkowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | 7-67 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 35 | 80 | |
| pts | 75-55 | 98-86 | 120-120 | 293-261 | |
| Total points | 130 | 184 | 240 | 554 | |
| Winners | 23 | 41 | 55 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 42% | 46% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 16 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 29/51 | 54/95 | 78/125 | 161/271 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | 62% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 41/54 | 55/78 | 119/161 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 76% | 71% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 23/41 | 23/47 | 60/110 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 56% | 49% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 10/30 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 33% | 43% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 | 11 | 22 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 7/8 | 8/11 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 88% | 73% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLLW
WWWWWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-67 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Emilio NavaNava (4-6 7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-4 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Emilio NavaNava (4-6 7-6(1) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
