Emilio Nava and Patrick Kypson will fight against each other in the quarter of the Cleveland Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.74
Patrick Kypson -> 1.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Patrick Kypson
This will be the 2nd time that Emilio Nava and Patrick Kypson play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nava (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Nava won 6-3 6-3 in the 1st round in M15 Sintra back in 2020.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 150, Emilio reached the quarter after beating Gabi Adrian Boitan 7-64 6-1 and Patrick Brady 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Brady (6-3 6-2). During the match, Nava scored 58 points vs Brady’s 39. The American was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nava recorded 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Emilio Nava was extremely efficient on serve to win 90% (27/30) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Emilio broke Brady 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nava hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Nava has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (157-102). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nava has an aggregate22-18 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Emilio has a compiled 4-2 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, the American reached the quarter after defeating Nathan Ponwith 6-3 6-2 and Murphy Cassone 6-4 7-64.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Cassone (6-4 7-64). During the match Kypson scored 76 points vs Cassone’s 68. The American was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Kypson managed to score 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Patrick Kypson was quite effective on serve to win 74% (26/35) of his 1st serve and 58% (21/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Cassone 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Patrick hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The American has a compiled 4-3 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 40 |
| Pts | 126-86 | 139-108 |
| Total Points | 212 | 247 |
| Winners | 52 | 56 |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% |
Both Nava and Kypson played 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nava and Kypson have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Nava played 3 games less than Kypson. Emilio scored 52 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Kypson fired 56 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 11 |
| 1st in | 60/96 | 69/120 |
| %1st in | 63% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 52/60 | 56/69 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 29/51 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Nava bagged 11 aces (5.5 per match). Kypson blasted 22 aces (11 per match). Nava won 87% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/15 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 47% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Nava broke his opponents 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Patrick conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | ||||
| R1 Adrian |
R2 Brady |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 | 37 | |
| pts | 68-47 | 58-39 | 126-86 | |
| Total points | 115 | 97 | 212 | |
| Winners | 25 | 27 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 47% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 30/45 | 60/96 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 67% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 27/30 | 52/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 90% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 9/15 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 60% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 60% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Kypson | ||||
| R1 Ponwith |
R2 Cassone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 23 | 40 | |
| pts | 63-40 | 76-68 | 139-108 | |
| Total points | 103 | 144 | 247 | |
| Winners | 30 | 26 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 34% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/49 | 35/71 | 69/120 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 49% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 30/34 | 26/35 | 56/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 74% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 21/36 | 29/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 58% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/7 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 43% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
LWWLWLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Denis KudlaKudla (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Patrick KypsonKypson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
