Zdenek Kolar and Hazem Naow will play each other in the quarter of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:30 pm on LOTTO RLP CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zdenek Kolar who should win in 3 sets.
Zdenek Kolar -> 1.69
Hazem Naow -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Zdenek Kolar vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Zdenek Kolar and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Zdenek Kolar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-23 | 1-2 | 11-12 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-35 | 6-8 | 19-19 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-36 | 1-6 | 17-24 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 41-32 | 1-4 | 34-19 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-19 | 1-3 | 9-8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 180, Zdenek got to the quarter after defeating Charles Broom 6-4 6-2 and Tristan Lamasine 6-3 7-63.
In the 2nd round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Lamasine (6-3 7-63). During the match, Kolar scored 86 points vs Lamasine’s 70. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kolar scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Zdenek Kolar lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Kolar put 65% of his first serves in, winning 78% (40/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. Zdenek broke Lamasine 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kolar hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Kolar has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 55% of his matches (306-253). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kolar has an aggregate52-46 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Kolar has a composed 3-2 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Koblenz Challenger
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 422 (career-high), Naow got to the quarter after beating Egor Gerasimov 2-6 7-5 6-3, Franco Agamenone 6-0 6-1, Billy Harris 7-5 7-5 and Oscar Otte 2-6 7-63 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Otte, Hazem recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-63 6-4).During the match Naow scored less points (1) than Otte. In fact, the world no. 180 won 98 points vs Otte’s. That means that Naow was more focused during the important points. Naow was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Naow scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 8 double faults. Hazem Naow lost the serve 8 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Naow put 61% of his first serves in, winning 61% (35/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (13/37) on the 2nd serve. The Syrian broke Otte 7 times after converting 41% of his break points (7/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Syrian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Naow’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Kish Island.
Hazem has an overall 14-2 win-loss record in 2024, 4-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Koblenz Challenger
Hazem has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kolar | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 97 |
| Pts | 143-111 | 348-307 |
| Total Points | 254 | 655 |
| Winners | 73 | 136 |
| %Winners | 51% | 39% |
Kolar played 2 matches while Naow competed in 4 matches. Naow started his run from the qualifications while Kolar had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Hazem Naow lost 2 sets while Zdenek Kolar hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kolar has played 6 set(s) less than Naow (4 vs 10). Therefore, Kolar played 57 games less than Naow. Zdenek scored 73 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Hazem made 136 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kolar | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 1st in | 95/131 | 201/317 |
| %1st in | 73% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 73/95 | 136/201 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 56/116 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 48% |
Kolar scored 5 aces (2.5 per match). Naow recorded 6 aces (1.5 per match). Kolar won 77% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kolar | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 19 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 19/50 |
| % Converted | 40% | 38% |
| Conceded | 3 | 28 |
| Saved | 1 | 15 |
| % Saved | 33% | 54% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 13 |
Zdenek broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Zdenek surrendered his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Naow broke his opponents 19 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Syrian conceded his serve 13 times and he saved 54% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kolar | ||||
| R1 Broom | R2 Lamasine | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 40 | |
| pts | 57-41 | 86-70 | 143-111 | |
| Total points | 98 | 156 | 254 | |
| Winners | 33 | 40 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 47% | 51% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/53 | 51/78 | 95/131 | |
| % 1st in | 83% | 65% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 40/51 | 73/95 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 78% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/9 | 11/27 | 17/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 41% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/9 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 33% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Naow | ||||||
| Q1 Gerasimov | Q3 Agamenone | R1 Harris | R2 Otte | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | 6-0 6-1 | 7-5 7-5 | 2-6 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 13 | 24 | 31 | 97 | |
| pts | 106-107 | 53-21 | 91-80 | 98-99 | 348-307 | |
| Total points | 213 | 74 | 171 | 197 | 655 | |
| Winners | 43 | 17 | 41 | 35 | 136 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 32% | 45% | 36% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 18 | |
| 1st in | 63/106 | 19/35 | 62/82 | 57/94 | 201/317 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 54% | 76% | 61% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 17/19 | 41/62 | 35/57 | 136/201 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 89% | 66% | 61% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/43 | 11/16 | 10/20 | 13/37 | 56/116 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 69% | 50% | 35% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 19 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 5/12 | 4/9 | 7/17 | 19/50 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 42% | 44% | 41% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 28 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 0/0 | 5/7 | 5/13 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 63% | – | 71% | 38% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 13 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction