Mitchell Krueger and Quinn Vandecasteele will play each other in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.21
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 4.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
There is no head to head record between Mitchell Krueger and Quinn Vandecasteele since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Mitchell Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-24 | 29-14 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, Krueger reached the 2nd round after beating Thomas Fancutt 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Fancutt (6-4 7-5). During the match, Krueger scored 68 points vs Fancutt’s 56. Krueger was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Krueger fired 6 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Mitchell Krueger was extremely efficient on serve to win 91% (30/33) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mitchell broke Fancutt twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Krueger has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (268-258). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krueger has an overall 29-35 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he beat Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Krueger has an aggregate 7-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Quinn Vandecasteele
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-14 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 636, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Bruno Kuzuhara 6-4 4-6 7-63.
In the 1st round, Vandecasteele defeated Kuzuhara (6-4 4-6 7-63). During the match Vandecasteele scored 114 points vs Kuzuhara’s 107. Quinn was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Vandecasteele blasted 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Quinn Vandecasteele lost the serve 3 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Vandecasteele put 50% of his first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (30/54) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kuzuhara 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The American has an aggregate 2-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Quinn has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 33 |
| Pts | 68-56 | 114-107 |
| Total Points | 124 | 221 |
| Winners | 30 | 38 |
| %Winners | 44% | 33% |
Both Krueger and Vandecasteele played 1 match. At the moment, Quinn Vandecasteele lost 1 set while Mitchell Krueger hasn’t dropped a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set(s) less than Vandecasteele (2 vs 3). Therefore, Krueger played 11 games less than Vandecasteele. The American scored 30 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Vandecasteele bagged 38 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 8 |
| 1st in | 33/57 | 55/109 |
| %1st in | 58% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 30/33 | 38/55 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 30/54 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 56% |
Krueger struck 6 aces . Vandecasteele fired 8 aces . Krueger won 91% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 33% | 60% |
| Conceded | 0 | 14 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Krueger broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. The American pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Vandecasteele conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| R1 Fancutt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 68-56 | 68-56 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 33/57 | 33/57 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 30/33 | 30/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Vandecasteele | |||
| R1 Kuzuhara |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 114-107 | 114-107 | |
| Total points | 221 | 221 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 55/109 | 55/109 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 38/55 | 38/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 30/54 | 30/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 11/14 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWLWWWWL
LLWWWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Denis KudlaKudla – Noah RubinRubin (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-0 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Denis KudlaKudla (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
