Brandon Nakashima and Filip Krajinovic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 8:30 pm on LOTTO RLP CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Nakashima who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Nakashima is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.54
Filip Krajinovic -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Nakashima vs. Filip Krajinovic
There is no head to head record between Brandon Nakashima and Filip Krajinovic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Brandon Nakashima
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 61-32 | 24-12 | 13-7 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-26 | 9-15 | 3-4 | 8-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 17-13 | 5-5 | 9-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-25 | 17-10 | 4-7 | 20-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-14 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 96, Nakashima got to the 2nd round after defeating Alejandro Moro Canas 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Brandon had a good straight sets win against Moro Canas (6-1 6-2). During the match, Nakashima scored 57 points vs Moro Canas’s 33. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nakashima scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Brandon Nakashima was exceptionally effective on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Brandon broke Moro Canas 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Nakashima has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (177-111). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nakashima has an aggregate54-20 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Tenerife 1 Challenger where he beat Pedro Martinez Portero in the final 6-3 6-4.
Nakashima has an overall 12-3 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Koblenz Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Filip Krajinovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-17 | 5-7 | 6-6 | 3-2 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-23 | 4-6 | 11-9 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-12 | 8-5 | 2-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 400, the Serbian got to the 2nd round after beating Michael Vrbensky 6-0 6-1, Elmar Ejupovic 6-3 6-2 and Ryan Peniston 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Krajinovic defeated Peniston (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match Krajinovic scored 87 points vs Peniston’s 72. Filip was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Krajinovic blasted 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Filip Krajinovic was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (39/50) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Krajinovic broke Peniston 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Krajinovic has an aggregate 3-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nakashima | Krajinovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 59 |
| Pts | 57-33 | 208-151 |
| Total Points | 90 | 359 |
| Winners | 22 | 88 |
| %Winners | 39% | 42% |
Nakashima played 1 match while Krajinovic competed in 3 matches. Krajinovic started his run from the qualifications while Nakashima had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Filip Krajinovic lost 1 set while Brandon Nakashima hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nakashima has played 5 set(s) less than Krajinovic (2 vs 7). Therefore, Nakashima played 44 games less than Krajinovic. The American scored 22 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Filip recorded 88 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nakashima | Krajinovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 28/43 | 112/174 |
| %1st in | 65% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 88/112 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 35/62 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 56% |
Nakashima blasted 1 ace . Krajinovic also made 11 aces (3.7 per match). Nakashima won 79% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Krajinovic won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nakashima | Krajinovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 12/30 |
| % Converted | 67% | 40% |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Brandon broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The American extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Serbian broke his opponents 12 times with a 40% conversion rate. Krajinovic conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nakashima | |||
| R1 Moro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 57-33 | 57-33 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 11/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Krajinovic | |||||
| Q1 Vrbensky |
Q3 Ejupovic |
R1 Peniston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 17 | 29 | 59 | |
| pts | 58-31 | 63-48 | 87-72 | 208-151 | |
| Total points | 89 | 111 | 159 | 359 | |
| Winners | 21 | 28 | 39 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 44% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 27/45 | 35/55 | 50/74 | 112/174 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 64% | 68% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 28/35 | 39/50 | 88/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 80% | 78% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/20 | 13/24 | 35/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 55% | 54% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 3/8 | 4/10 | 12/30 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 38% | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 1/1 | 1/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 25% | 225% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLLWLW
LLWLWLWLWL Tennis Scores in Koblenz Challenger
- Martin DammDamm – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (7-61 5-7 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Alexander BlockxBlockx (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Tristan LamasineLamasine (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Oscar OtteOtte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
