Timo Stodder and Kilian Feldbausch will face off in the 2nd round of the Piracicaba Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:00 pm on QUADRA CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kilian Feldbausch who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kilian Feldbausch is the pick to win this match.
Kilian Feldbausch -> 1.43
Timo Stodder -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Timo Stodder vs. Kilian Feldbausch
This will be the 2nd time that Timo Stodder and Kilian Feldbausch clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Stodder (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Stodder won 4-6 6-4 6-1 in the 2nd round in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula back in 2023.
Timo Stodder
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-34 | 0-1 | 40-31 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-15 | 4-4 | 29-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 328, Stodder reached the 2nd round after beating Juan Pablo Ficovich 7-5 5-7 6-4.
In the 1st round, Stodder defeated Pablo Ficovich (7-5 5-7 6-4). During the match, Stodder scored 116 points vs Pablo Ficovich’s 114. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stodder scored 10 aces and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Timo Stodder lost the serve 5 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Stodder put 49% of his first serves in, winning 70% (44/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (29/66) on the 2nd serve. Timo broke Pablo Ficovich 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Stodder has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 66% of his matches (190-97). 2-3 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Stodder has a composed154-77 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Stodder has a composed 2-3 win-loss record in 2024, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Piracicaba Challenger
Kilian Feldbausch
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 16-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-17 | 4-2 | 20-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-10 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 452, Feldbausch reached the 2nd round after defeating Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos 3-6 6-3 6-4, Alex Marti Pujolras 4-6 7-65 4-1 ret. and Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Sanchez-Izquierdo (6-4 6-4). During the match Feldbausch scored 68 points vs Sanchez-Izquierdo’s 56. Feldbausch was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Feldbausch scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 7 double faults. Kilian Feldbausch lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Feldbausch put 67% of his first serves in, winning 65% (26/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (7/20) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Sanchez-Izquierdo 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
The Swiss has a compiled 3-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Piracicaba Challenger
Kilian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stodder | Feldbausch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 76 |
| Pts | 116-114 | 253-225 |
| Total Points | 230 | 478 |
| Winners | 44 | 97 |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% |
Stodder played 1 match while Feldbausch competed in 3 matches. Feldbausch started his run from the qualifications while Stodder had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Timo Stodder lost 1 set, while Kilian Feldbausch dropped 2 sets. Stodder has played 6 set(s) less than Feldbausch (3 vs 9). Therefore, Stodder played 42 games less than Feldbausch. Timo scored 44 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Kilian made 97 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stodder | Feldbausch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 2 |
| 1st in | 63/129 | 153/238 |
| %1st in | 49% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 44/63 | 97/153 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 29/66 | 39/85 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 46% |
Stodder scored 10 aces . Feldbausch bagged 6 aces (2 per match). Stodder won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Feldbausch won 63% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stodder | Feldbausch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 17 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 17/32 |
| % Converted | 60% | 53% |
| Conceded | 16 | 27 |
| Saved | 11 | 14 |
| % Saved | 69% | 52% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 13 |
The German broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Stodder lost his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. The Swiss broke his opponents 17 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve 13 times and he saved 52% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stodder | |||
| R1 Pablo Ficovich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 116-114 | 116-114 | |
| Total points | 230 | 230 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 63/129 | 63/129 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 44/63 | 44/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 29/66 | 29/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 11/16 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Feldbausch | |||||
| Q1 Andre Saraiva Dos |
Q3 Marti |
R1 Sanchez-Izquierdo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | 4-6 7-65 4-1 ret. | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | 20 | 76 | |
| pts | 89-81 | 96-88 | 68-56 | 253-225 | |
| Total points | 170 | 184 | 124 | 478 | |
| Winners | 37 | 34 | 26 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 35% | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | 7 | 25 | |
| 1st in | 51/85 | 62/93 | 40/60 | 153/238 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 67% | 67% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 37/51 | 34/62 | 26/40 | 97/153 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 55% | 65% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 13/31 | 7/20 | 39/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 42% | 35% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 8 | 6 | 17 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 8/14 | 6/8 | 17/32 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 57% | 75% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 14 | 6 | 27 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 7/14 | 2/6 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 50% | 33% | 154% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 | 4 | 13 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWLWW
LWWWWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Piracicaba Challenger
- Timo StodderStodder – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (7-5 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Felix GillGill – Orlando LuzLuz (7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Mateus AlvesAlves – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-4 2-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-3 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-2 6-70 6-2) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (4-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-4 2-6 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (4-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-2 6-7(0) 6-2) – See score progression
- Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Alexander WeisWeis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Gianluca MagerMager (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
