James Duckworth and Patrick Maloney will play each other in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.11
Patrick Maloney -> 5.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Patrick Maloney
There is no head to head record between James Duckworth and Patrick Maloney since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
James Duckworth
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-18 | 16-8 | 2-3 | 5-2 | 10-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-10 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 98, Duckworth reached the 2nd round after defeating Toby Alex Kodat 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Alex Kodat (6-3 6-0). During the match, Duckworth scored 56 points vs Alex Kodat’s 35. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Duckworth recorded 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. James Duckworth was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Duckworth was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Alex Kodat 4 times.
Duckworth has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (274-178). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Duckworth has an aggregate 26-23 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Australian has an overall 5-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Patrick Maloney
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-8 | 10-3 | 7-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-10 | 4-3 | 7-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 891, Maloney reached the 2nd round after beating Jacob Brumm 6-3 6-1, Preston Brown 6-2 6-1 and Ezekiel Clark 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Clark (6-2 6-3). During the match Maloney scored 55 points vs Clark’s 39. The American was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Maloney made 8 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Patrick Maloney was very efficient on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Clark 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Patrick has an overall 7-3 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Duckworth | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 48 |
| Pts | 56-35 | 178-114 |
| Total Points | 91 | 292 |
| Winners | 24 | 74 |
| %Winners | 43% | 42% |
Duckworth played 1 match while Maloney competed in 3 matches. Maloney started his run from the qualifications while Duckworth had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Duckworth has played 4 set(s) less than Maloney (2 vs 6). Therefore, Duckworth played 33 games less than Maloney. Duckworth scored 24 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 74 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Duckworth | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4.7 |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 91/131 |
| %1st in | 64% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 74/91 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 22/40 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 55% |
Duckworth struck 5 aces . Maloney scored 14 aces (4.7 per match). Duckworth won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Maloney won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Duckworth | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 13/22 |
| % Converted | 100% | 59% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. James had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Patrick broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. Patrick conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Duckworth | |||
| R1 Alex |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-35 | 56-35 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 30/47 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Maloney | |||||
| Q1 Brumm |
Q3 Brown |
R1 Clark |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 17 | 48 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 63-37 | 55-39 | 178-114 | |
| Total points | 98 | 100 | 94 | 292 | |
| Winners | 23 | 26 | 25 | 74 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 1 | 8 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 32/42 | 31/50 | 91/131 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 76% | 62% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 26/32 | 25/31 | 74/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 81% | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 4/10 | 12/19 | 22/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 40% | 63% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/10 | 3/4 | 13/22 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 50% | 75% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLW
WWWWWLLWWW Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Ezekiel ClarkClark (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Keegan SmithSmith (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – William GrantGrant (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Patrick BradyBrady – Lucas GerchGerch (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (4-6 6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Noah RubinRubin – Matija PecoticPecotic (5-7 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (3-6 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Nick ChappellChappell (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Nathan PonwithPonwith (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-4 4-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Tim HandelHandel (6-76 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (7-6(4) 6-1) – See score progression
- Patrick BradyBrady – Lucas GerchGerch (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-1 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Keegan SmithSmith (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Nick ChappellChappell (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (4-6 6-3 7-6(1)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Noah RubinRubin – Denis KudlaKudla (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
