Daniel Michalski and Kenny de Schepper will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on LOTTO RLP CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kenny de Schepper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kenny de Schepper is the pick to win this match.
Kenny de Schepper -> 1.59
Daniel Michalski -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Michalski vs. Kenny de Schepper
There is no head to head record between Daniel Michalski and Kenny de Schepper since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Daniel Michalski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-24 | 1-6 | 35-17 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-10 | 7-3 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 285, the Pole reached the qualifications after beating Mats Rosenkranz 7-67 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Rosenkranz (7-67 6-3). During the match, Michalski scored 71 points vs Rosenkranz’s 61. The Pole was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Michalski blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Daniel Michalski lost the serve once. Furthermore, Michalski put 74% of his first serves in, winning 84% (41/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Rosenkranz twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Michalski has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (201-119). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Michalski has an aggregate4-5 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Daniel has an aggregate 1-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Koblenz Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Kenny de Schepper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-24 | 7-5 | 4-8 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 487, De Schepper got to the qualifications after defeating Steven Diez 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Diez (6-3 6-2). During the match de Schepper scored 60 points vs Diez’s 38. Kenny was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, de Schepper blasted 3 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Kenny de Schepper was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (27/34) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player broke Diez 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Kenny’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Bressuire.
The French player has a compiled 7-3 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Koblenz Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2018. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Michalski | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 |
| Pts | 71-61 | 60-38 |
| Total Points | 132 | 98 |
| Winners | 41 | 27 |
| %Winners | 58% | 45% |
Both Michalski and de Schepper played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Michalski and de Schepper have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Michalski played 5 games more than de Schepper. Daniel scored 41 winners (58% of the total points). On the other side, Kenny recorded 27 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Michalski | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 49/66 | 34/53 |
| %1st in | 74% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 41/49 | 27/34 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 12/19 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 63% |
Michalski blasted 2 aces . de Schepper fired 3 aces . Michalski won 84% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, de Schepper won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Michalski | de Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 67% | 80% |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Pole broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Michalski surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Kenny broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Kenny conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Michalski | |||
| Q1 Rosenkranz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 71-61 | 71-61 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 49/66 | 49/66 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 41/49 | 41/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| de Schepper | |||
| Q1 Diez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 60-38 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 34/53 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 27/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWLL
LWWLWWLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Dennis NovakNovak (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Jules MarieMarie (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
