Franco Agamenone and Hazem Naow will play each other in the qualifications of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on VR BANK COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Franco Agamenone is the pick to win this match.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.82
Hazem Naow -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Franco Agamenone and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-26 | 1-4 | 13-18 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 207, Franco reached the qualifications after defeating Mika Lipp 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Franco had a good straight sets win against Lipp (6-2 6-2). During the match, Agamenone scored 53 points vs Lipp’s 29. Franco was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Agamenone bagged 2 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Franco Agamenone was pretty efficient on serve to win 83% (20/24) of his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Franco broke Lipp 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Agamenone has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (304-196). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Agamenone has a composed 5-6 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Agamenone has an overall 1-3 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Koblenz Challenger
Agamenone has never competed in this tournament before.
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-21 | 6-3 | 13-10 | 17-7 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2023 | 48-24 | 17-5 | 25-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 5-4 |
| 2022 | 23-17 | 14-6 | 8-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 42-18 | 32-13 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 468 (career-high), Naow reached the qualifications after defeating Egor Gerasimov 2-6 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Gerasimov, Hazem recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-5 6-3).During the match Naow scored less points (1) than Gerasimov. In fact, the world no. 207 won 106 points vs Gerasimov’s. That means that Naow was more focused during the important points. Naow was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Naow scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Hazem Naow lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Naow put 59% of his first serves in, winning 68% (43/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (22/43) on the 2nd serve. Hazem broke Gerasimov 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Hazem’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island.
Hazem has a composed 11-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 29 |
| Pts | 53-29 | 106-107 |
| Total Points | 82 | 213 |
| Winners | 20 | 43 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Agamenone and Naow played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Hazem Naow surrendered 1 set while Franco Agamenone hasn’t lost a set so far. Agamenone has played 1 set(s) less than Naow (2 vs 3). Therefore, Agamenone played 13 games less than Naow. Agamenone scored 20 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Naow managed to score 43 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 63/106 |
| %1st in | 67% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 43/63 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 22/43 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 51% |
Agamenone struck 2 aces . Naow blasted 1 ace . Agamenone won 83% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 71% | 25% |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Franco broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Agamenone conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Naow broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Syrian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | |||
| Q1 Lipp |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 53-29 | 53-29 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 24/36 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 20/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Naow | |||
| Q1 Gerasimov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 106-107 | 106-107 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 63/106 | 63/106 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 43/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/43 | 22/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLWLWL
LWLLWLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Dennis NovakNovak (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Jules MarieMarie (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
