Matthew Hulme and Mitchell Harper will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Burnie 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Harper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Harper is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Harper -> 1.64
Matthew Hulme -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matthew Hulme vs. Mitchell Harper
There is no head to head record between Matthew Hulme and Mitchell Harper since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Matthew Hulme
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-17 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-21 | 13-13 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-11 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, matthew reached the qualifications after defeating Hanyi Liu 6-74 6-3 2-0 ret..
In the qualifications against Liu, the Australian had a free pass after Liu retired on a 6-74 6-3 2-0 . scoreline.
Hulme has a winning match record in the last 3 years having won 52% of his matches (38-35). 9-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Hulme has an aggregate33-27 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
Hulme has a composed 9-3 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 1 Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Mitchell Harper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-12 | 6-7 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-9 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-19 | 26-17 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 893, Harper reached the qualifications after beating Calum Puttergill 6-3 5-7 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian defeated Puttergill (6-3 5-7 6-2). During the match Harper scored 104 points vs Puttergill’s 92. Mitchell was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Harper made 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Mitchell Harper lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Harper put 66% of his first serves in, winning 63% (42/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Puttergill 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Australian has an aggregate 1-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hulme | Harper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 29 |
| Pts | 78-71 | 104-92 |
| Total Points | 149 | 196 |
| Winners | 43 | 42 |
| %Winners | 55% | 40% |
Both Hulme and Harper played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Matthew Hulme lost 1 set, while Mitchell Harper dropped 1 set. Hulme has played 1 set more than Harper (4 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Hulme played 5 games less than Harper. Matthew scored 43 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, Harper managed to score 42 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hulme | Harper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 60/84 | 67/101 |
| %1st in | 71% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 43/60 | 42/67 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 19/34 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 56% |
Hulme blasted 5 aces . Harper managed to score 3 aces . Hulme won 72% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Harper won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hulme | Harper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 100% | 56% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Australian broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The Australian had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Australian broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Harper conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hulme | |||
| Q1 Liu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-3 2-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 78-71 | 78-71 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 60/84 | 60/84 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 43/60 | 43/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Harper | |||
| Q1 Puttergill |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 104-92 | 104-92 | |
| Total points | 196 | 196 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 67/101 | 67/101 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 42/67 | 42/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWWWLL
LWLLLWLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Maxime ChazalChazal (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Jake DelaneyDelaney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon WalkinWalkin – Shintaro ImaiImai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Blake MottMott (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Dane SweenySweeny (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew HulmeHulme – Mitchell HarperHarper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Takuya KumasakaKumasaka – Corey GaalGaal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taisei IchikawaIchikawa – Scott JonesJones (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Luke SavilleSaville (3-3) – H2H and prediction
