Zachary Svajda and Sebastian Fanselow will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Indian Wells 2 Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 10:00 am on PC3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zachary Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.21
Sebastian Fanselow -> 3.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Sebastian Fanselow
This will be the 4th time that Zachary Svajda and Sebastian Fanselow fight against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Fanselow (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Svajda won 6-2 7-5 in the 2nd round in the Knoxville Challenger back in 2023.
Zachary Svajda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-21 | 16-11 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 143, Svajda reached the semifinal after defeating Gabriel Debru 6-4 6-1, Strong Kirchheimer 6-2 6-1 and Bor Artnak 6-2 3-6 6-0.
In the quarter, The American defeated Artnak (6-2 3-6 6-0). During the match, Svajda scored 77 points vs Artnak’s 60. Svajda was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Svajda bagged 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Zachary Svajda was extremely efficient on serve to win 86% (25/29) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Svajda broke Artnak 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 1 set in this event to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Svajda has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (127-89). 4-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Svajda has a composed98-53 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Svajda has a composed 4-2 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger
Zachary has never competed in this tournament before.
Sebastian Fanselow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-22 | 7-8 | 5-8 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-31 | 24-9 | 20-15 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 5-11 | 17-13 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 17-13 | 13-11 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 34-15 | 34-13 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 324, the German reached the semifinal after defeating Vasek Pospisil 6-2 7-5, Trevor Svajda 6-4 6-4 and Learner Tien 7-64 5-7 6-4.
In the quarter, Fanselow defeated Tien (7-64 5-7 6-4). During the match Fanselow scored 116 points vs Tien’s 105. Fanselow was pretty aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Fanselow bagged 11 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Sebastian Fanselow lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Fanselow put 56% of his first serves in, winning 85% (50/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (23/47) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Tien 3 times after converting 20% of his break points (3/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Fanselow has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Sebastian has an overall 6-3 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 75 |
| Pts | 197-137 | 258-226 |
| Total Points | 334 | 484 |
| Winners | 67 | 91 |
| %Winners | 34% | 35% |
Both Svajda and Fanselow played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Zachary Svajda lost 1 set, while Sebastian Fanselow lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Svajda and Fanselow have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Svajda played 20 games less than Fanselow. Zachary scored 67 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The German recorded 91 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 4.7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 89/158 | 121/225 |
| %1st in | 56% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 67/89 | 91/121 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 46/69 | 57/104 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 55% |
Svajda blasted 14 aces (4.7 per match). Fanselow recorded 18 aces (6 per match). Svajda won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Fanselow won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 12 |
| Converted | 13/18 | 12/36 |
| % Converted | 72% | 33% |
| Conceded | 6 | 19 |
| Saved | 4 | 12 |
| % Saved | 67% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
Zachary broke his opponents 13 times with a 72% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Fanselow broke his opponents 12 times with a 33% conversion rate. Fanselow conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Svajda | |||||
| R1 Debru |
R2 Kirchheimer |
1/4 Artnak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 23 | 55 | |
| pts | 65-43 | 55-34 | 77-60 | 197-137 | |
| Total points | 108 | 89 | 137 | 334 | |
| Winners | 22 | 20 | 25 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 36% | 32% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 7 | 7 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 25/43 | 29/56 | 89/158 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 58% | 52% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 22/35 | 20/25 | 25/29 | 67/89 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 80% | 86% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 13/18 | 16/27 | 46/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 72% | 59% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/5 | 5/7 | 13/18 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 80% | 71% | 72% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 72% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Fanselow | |||||
| R1 Pospisil |
R2 Svajda |
1/4 Tien |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-64 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 35 | 75 | |
| pts | 73-57 | 69-64 | 116-105 | 258-226 | |
| Total points | 130 | 133 | 221 | 484 | |
| Winners | 21 | 20 | 50 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | 43% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 6 | 11 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 31/55 | 31/64 | 59/106 | 121/225 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 48% | 56% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 21/31 | 20/31 | 50/59 | 91/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 65% | 85% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 19/33 | 23/47 | 57/104 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 58% | 49% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 4/11 | 3/15 | 12/36 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 36% | 20% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 9 | 19 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 5/7 | 6/9 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 71% | 67% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWW
LLLWWLLLWL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells 2 Challenger
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Brandon HoltHolt (6-3 2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-6 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Learner TienTien (7-64 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Thomas Fancutt/Ajeet RaiFancutt/Ajeet Rai – George Goldhoff/James Kent TrotterGoldhoff/James Kent Trotter (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Brandon HoltHolt (6-3 2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-6 7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
