Thai Kwiatkowski and Paul Jubb will face off in the 2nd round of the Indian Wells 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on PC5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.68
Thai Kwiatkowski -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thai Kwiatkowski vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Thai Kwiatkowski and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Thai Kwiatkowski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-19 | 19-8 | 1-7 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 23-15 | 7-3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-24 | 5-9 | 9-6 | 5-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 11-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 316, Thai got to the 2nd round after defeating Maxwell Mckennon 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Thai had a good straight sets win against Mckennon (6-4 6-3). During the match, Kwiatkowski scored 73 points vs Mckennon’s 59. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kwiatkowski blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Thai Kwiatkowski lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kwiatkowski put 57% of his first serves in, winning 66% (23/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the 2nd serve. Thai broke Mckennon 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Kwiatkowski has positive record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (195-138). 4-1 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kwiatkowski has an overall 124-83 match record in the last years on hard.
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger.
Thai has an overall 6-2 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 607, Jubb got to the 2nd round after beating Ozan Baris 7-61 6-2.
In the 1st round, Jubb had a good straight sets win against Baris (7-61 6-2). During the match Jubb scored 75 points vs Baris’s 60. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Baris 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Jubb’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger.
The Brit has a composed 6-3 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kwiatkowski | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
| Pts | 73-59 | 75-60 |
| Total Points | 132 | 135 |
| Winners | 23 | 34 |
| %Winners | 32% | 45% |
Both Kwiatkowski and Jubb played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kwiatkowski and Jubb have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kwiatkowski played 2 games less than Jubb. Kwiatkowski scored 23 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Jubb blasted 34 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kwiatkowski | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 35/61 | 48/75 |
| %1st in | 57% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 23/35 | 34/48 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/27 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 59% |
Kwiatkowski bagged 3 aces . Jubb managed to score 8 aces . Kwiatkowski won 66% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kwiatkowski | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 33% | 38% |
| Conceded | 8 | 11 |
| Saved | 7 | 10 |
| % Saved | 88% | 91% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Thai conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve once and he saved 91% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kwiatkowski | |||
| R1 Mckennon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 73-59 | 73-59 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/61 | 35/61 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Jubb | ||||
| R1 Baris |
R1 Baris |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-2 | 7-61 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | 42 | |
| pts | 75-60 | 75-60 | 150-120 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | 270 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/75 | 48/75 | 96/150 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | 68/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | 32/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | 22 | |
| Saved | 10/11 | 10/11 | 20 | |
| Saved % | 91% | 91% | 182% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLLWLWW
LLWLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells 2 Challenger
- Tim HandelHandel – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara – Matija PecoticPecotic (7-65 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Thomas Fancutt/Ajeet RaiFancutt/Ajeet Rai – Mac Kiger/Benjamin SigouinKiger/Benjamin Sigouin (6-4 3-6 10-6) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Ozan BarisBaris (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Omni KumarKumar (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yshai OlielOliel – Benjamin LockLock (3-6 7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-6 7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Evan ZhuZhu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Lucas GerchGerch (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara – Matija PecoticPecotic (7-6(5) 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Ozan BarisBaris (7-6(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Tim HandelHandel – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim HandelHandel – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
