Zachary Svajda and Strong Kirchheimer will play each other in the 2nd round of the Indian Wells 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on PC4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zachary Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.3
Strong Kirchheimer -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Strong Kirchheimer
This will be the 3rd time that Zachary Svajda and Strong Kirchheimer clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Svajda and Kirchheimer (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Svajda won 4-6 6-2 6-4 in the qualifications in the Chicago Challenger back in 2022.
Zachary Svajda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-21 | 16-11 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 143, Zachary reached the 2nd round after defeating Gabriel Debru 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Debru (6-4 6-1). During the match, Svajda scored 65 points vs Debru’s 43. Zachary was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Svajda couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Zachary Svajda lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Svajda put 59% of his first serves in, winning 63% (22/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (17/24) on the 2nd serve. Svajda broke Debru 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Svajda has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (125-89). 2-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Svajda has an aggregate96-53 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The American has a compiled 2-2 win-loss record in 2024, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Strong Kirchheimer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-15 | 8-7 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 417, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Evan Zhu 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Strong had a good straight sets win against Zhu (6-4 6-4). During the match Kirchheimer scored 68 points vs Zhu’s 54. Strong was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Kirchheimer managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Strong Kirchheimer lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kirchheimer put 60% of his first serves in, winning 71% (29/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Zhu 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Strong has an aggregate 2-1 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 |
| Pts | 65-43 | 68-54 |
| Total Points | 108 | 122 |
| Winners | 22 | 29 |
| %Winners | 34% | 43% |
Both Svajda and Kirchheimer played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Svajda and Kirchheimer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Svajda played 3 games less than Kirchheimer. The American scored 22 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 29 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 41/68 |
| %1st in | 59% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 22/35 | 29/41 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 11/27 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 41% |
Svajda didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kirchheimer recorded 3 aces . Svajda won 63% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Kirchheimer won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 67% | 71% |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 7 |
| % Saved | 67% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Svajda broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Kirchheimer conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Svajda | |||
| R1 Debru |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 65-43 | 65-43 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 35/59 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 22/35 | 22/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 17/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kirchheimer | |||
| R1 Zhu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-54 | 68-54 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/68 | 41/68 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 11/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWW
LWLWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells 2 Challenger
- Thomas Fancutt/Ajeet RaiFancutt/Ajeet Rai – Mac Kiger/Benjamin SigouinKiger/Benjamin Sigouin (6-4 3-6 10-6) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Ozan BarisBaris (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara – Matija PecoticPecotic (7-65 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tim HandelHandel – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Omni KumarKumar (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Lucas GerchGerch (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-6 7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Evan ZhuZhu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Yshai OlielOliel – Benjamin LockLock (3-6 7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara – Matija PecoticPecotic (7-6(5) 0-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Ozan BarisBaris (7-6(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Tim HandelHandel – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim HandelHandel – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
