Moez Echargui and Arjun Kadhe will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Moez Echargui who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Moez Echargui is the pick to win this match.
Moez Echargui -> 1.26
Arjun Kadhe -> 3.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Moez Echargui vs. Arjun Kadhe
There is no head to head record between Moez Echargui and Arjun Kadhe since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Moez Echargui
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-16 | 9-10 | 2-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-34 | 23-10 | 23-22 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 7-2 | 37-26 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-24 | 38-17 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-14 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283, the Tunisian reached the qualifications after defeating Cyril Vandermeersch 7-68 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Tunisian defeated Vandermeersch (7-68 2-6 6-4).During the match, Echargui scored less points (6) than Vandermeersch. In fact, the world no. 283 won 99 points vs Vandermeersch’s. That means that Echargui was more focused during the important points. Moez was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Echargui managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Moez Echargui lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Echargui put 56% of his first serves in, winning 74% (45/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (20/47) on the 2nd serve. The Tunisian broke Vandermeersch 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Echargui has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (267-196). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Echargui has an overall3-11 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Moez has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Quimper Challenger
The Tunisian has never competed in this tournament before.
Arjun Kadhe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-9 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-19 | 14-10 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-13 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 13-10 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 806, Arjun got to the qualifications after defeating Mikalai Haliak 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kadhe had a good straight sets win against Haliak (7-5 6-4). During the match Kadhe scored 74 points vs Haliak’s 73. The Indian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Kadhe blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Arjun Kadhe was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (34/46) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Arjun broke Haliak twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
The Indian has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Echargui | Kadhe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 22 |
| Pts | 99-105 | 74-73 |
| Total Points | 204 | 147 |
| Winners | 45 | 34 |
| %Winners | 45% | 46% |
Both Echargui and Kadhe played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Moez Echargui conceded 1 set while Arjun Kadhe hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Echargui has played 1 set more than Kadhe (3 vs 2). Therefore, Echargui played 9 games more than Kadhe. Echargui scored 45 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian fired 34 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Echargui | Kadhe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 61/108 | 46/75 |
| %1st in | 56% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 45/61 | 34/46 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 20/47 | 16/29 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 55% |
Echargui managed to score 5 aces . Kadhe made 7 aces . Echargui won 74% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Kadhe won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Echargui | Kadhe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 75% | 40% |
| Conceded | 11 | 1 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 64% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
Moez broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Moez surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Arjun was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Echargui | |||
| Q1 Vandermeersch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 99-105 | 99-105 | |
| Total points | 204 | 204 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 61/108 | 61/108 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 45/61 | 45/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/47 | 20/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Kadhe | |||
| Q1 Haliak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 74-73 | 74-73 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/75 | 46/75 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 34/46 | 34/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLLW
LLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Tristan LamasineLamasine (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PoullainPoullain – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Maxime CressyCressy (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Arjun KadheKadhe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilien VoisinVoisin – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
