Thomas Fancutt and Matias Soto will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Indian Wells 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 10:00 am on PC6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matias Soto who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matias Soto is the pick to win this match.
Matias Soto -> 1.35
Thomas Fancutt -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thomas Fancutt vs. Matias Soto
This will be the 2nd time that Thomas Fancutt and Matias Soto fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Soto (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Soto won 6-3 6-1 in the qualifications in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger back in January 2024.
Thomas Fancutt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-20 | 18-17 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-1 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-23 | 28-18 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-18 | 16-15 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 503, Fancutt reached the qualifications after defeating Colin Markes 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Fancutt had a good straight sets win against Markes (6-4 6-1). During the match, Fancutt scored 65 points vs Markes’s 49. Thomas was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fancutt managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Thomas Fancutt was very efficient on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Markes 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Fancutt has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 54% of his matches (165-143). 2-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Fancutt has a compiled121-109 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Thomas has a composed 2-3 win-loss record in 2024, 2-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger
Matias Soto
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-15 | 6-5 | 15-9 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-19 | 4-4 | 14-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-7 | 7-3 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-9 | 6-3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 666, Soto got to the qualifications after beating Kyle Kang 7-66 6-3.
In the qualifications, Soto had a good straight sets win against Kang (7-66 6-3). During the match Soto scored 77 points vs Kang’s 58. Soto was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Soto blasted 2 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Matias Soto lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Soto put 70% of his first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the 2nd serve. Soto broke Kang 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Chilean has a composed 3-1 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fancutt | Soto |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 22 |
| Pts | 65-49 | 77-58 |
| Total Points | 114 | 135 |
| Winners | 22 | 32 |
| %Winners | 34% | 42% |
Both Fancutt and Soto played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fancutt and Soto have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fancutt played 5 games less than Soto. Thomas scored 22 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Matias fired 32 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fancutt | Soto |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 2 |
| 1st in | 27/55 | 47/67 |
| %1st in | 49% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 32/47 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 14/20 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 70% |
Fancutt struck 5 aces . Soto scored 2 aces . Fancutt won 81% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Soto won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fancutt | Soto |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 57% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Thomas broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Australian pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Soto broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Chilean conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fancutt | |||
| Q1 Markes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 65-49 | 65-49 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 27/55 | 27/55 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Soto | |||
| Q1 Kang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 77-58 | 77-58 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 47/67 | 47/67 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWWLWL
LWWWLWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Yshai OlielOliel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Matias SotoSoto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Jaimee Floyd AngelFloyd Angel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxwell MckennonMckennon – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
