Elijah Strode and Ozan Baris will play each other in the qualifications of the Indian Wells 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on PC4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ozan Baris who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ozan Baris is the pick to win this match.
Ozan Baris -> 1.17
Elijah Strode -> 4.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elijah Strode vs. Ozan Baris
There is no head to head record between Elijah Strode and Ozan Baris since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Elijah Strode
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-11 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-22 | 10-13 | 6-8 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Strode reached the qualifications after defeating Daniel Cukierman 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, Elijah had a good straight sets win against Cukierman (6-4 6-0). During the match, Strode scored 63 points vs Cukierman’s 44. Elijah was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Strode made 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Elijah Strode lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Strode put 67% of his first serves in, winning 78% (31/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 30% (6/20) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Cukierman 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Strode has a weak win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 47% of his matches (38-42). 1-1 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Strode has a composed27-32 record in the last 4 years on hard.
Strode has a composed 1-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger
Ozan Baris
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-15 | 13-11 | 2-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-11 | 0-1 | 9-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 648, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Ajeet Rai 6-1 2-0 ret..
In the qualifications against Rai, Ozan had a free pass after Rai retired on a 6-1 2-0 . scoreline.
Ozan has an aggregate 3-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Strode | Baris |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 9 |
| Pts | 63-44 | 35-18 |
| Total Points | 107 | 53 |
| Winners | 31 | 9 |
| %Winners | 49% | 26% |
Both Strode and Baris played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Strode has played 1 set(s) less than Baris (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Strode played 7 games more than Baris. Strode scored 31 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Ozan managed to score 9 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Strode | Baris |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
| 1st in | 40/60 | 13/22 |
| %1st in | 67% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 9/13 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 6/20 | 7/9 |
| %2nd pts | 30% | 78% |
Strode made 4 aces . Baris recorded 1 ace . Strode won 78% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 30% of the points. On the other side, Baris won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 78% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Strode | Baris |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 56% | 67% |
| Conceded | 5 | 0 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 80% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Strode broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Elijah surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Baris broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Strode | |||
| Q1 Cukierman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-44 | 63-44 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/60 | 40/60 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/20 | 6/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 30% | 30% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Baris | |||
| Q1 Rai |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 2-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 9 | 9 | |
| pts | 35-18 | 35-18 | |
| Total points | 53 | 53 | |
| Winners | 9 | 9 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 9/13 | 9/13 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLLLL
LLLLLWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Yshai OlielOliel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Matias SotoSoto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Jaimee Floyd AngelFloyd Angel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxwell MckennonMckennon – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
