Mitchell Krueger and Paul Jubb will square off in the semifinal of the Indian Wells 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 12:30 pm on PC3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.58
Mitchell Krueger -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Paul Jubb
This will be the 2nd time that Mitchell Krueger and Paul Jubb face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Jubb (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Jubb won 7-5 4-6 6-2 in the 1st round in the Charleston Challenger back in 2022.
Mitchell Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 286, the American got to the semifinal after defeating Matias Soto 6-4 7-63, Benjamin Lock 6-4 6-4 and Learner Tien 6-4 7-66.
In the quarter, Krueger had a good straight sets win against Tien (6-4 7-66). During the match, Krueger scored 78 points vs Tien’s 69. Mitchell was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger scored 6 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Mitchell Krueger lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 69% of his first serves in, winning 67% (33/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Krueger broke Tien 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mitchell hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Krueger has good record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (264-257). 3-0 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Krueger has an aggregate 186-158 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Mitchell has an aggregate 3-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 607, Jubb reached the semifinal after beating Patrick Brady 6-3 6-0, Stefan Kozlov 4-6 6-3 6-3 and Omni Kumar 6-76 6-4 6-1.
In the quarter against Kumar, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-76 6-4 6-1). During the match Jubb scored 107 points vs Kumar’s 91. Paul was very aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb recorded 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 68% of his first serves in, winning 69% (48/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Kumar 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Paul has a composed 5-2 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 66 | 73 |
| Pts | 236-200 | 261-212 |
| Total Points | 436 | 473 |
| Winners | 91 | 103 |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% |
Both Krueger and Jubb played 3 matches. At the moment, Paul Jubb surrendered 2 sets while Mitchell Krueger hasn’t dropped a set so far. Krueger has played 2 set(s) less than Jubb (6 vs 8). Therefore, Krueger played 7 games less than Jubb. The American scored 91 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit scored 103 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 121/191 | 149/228 |
| %1st in | 63% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 91/121 | 103/149 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 39/70 | 45/79 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Krueger recorded 18 aces (6 per match). Jubb bagged 7 aces (2.3 per match). Krueger won 75% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 14 |
| Converted | 11/33 | 14/35 |
| % Converted | 33% | 40% |
| Conceded | 16 | 12 |
| Saved | 9 | 8 |
| % Saved | 56% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 4 |
Mitchell broke his opponents 11 times with a 33% conversion rate. Mitchell dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Jubb broke his opponents 14 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||||
| R1 Soto |
R2 Lock |
1/4 Tien |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 23 | 66 | |
| pts | 84-71 | 74-60 | 78-69 | 236-200 | |
| Total points | 155 | 134 | 147 | 436 | |
| Winners | 32 | 26 | 33 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 35% | 42% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 6 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 39/64 | 33/56 | 49/71 | 121/191 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 59% | 69% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 26/33 | 33/49 | 91/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 79% | 67% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 11/23 | 11/22 | 39/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 48% | 50% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 2/12 | 4/10 | 5/11 | 11/33 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 40% | 45% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 10 | 16 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/4 | 6/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 60% | 53% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | |
| Jubb | |||||
| R1 Brady |
R2 Kozlov |
1/4 Kumar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | 6-76 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 28 | 30 | 73 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 91-80 | 107-91 | 261-212 | |
| Total points | 104 | 171 | 198 | 473 | |
| Winners | 23 | 32 | 48 | 103 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 35% | 45% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 29/42 | 50/83 | 70/103 | 149/228 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 60% | 68% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 32/50 | 48/70 | 103/149 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 64% | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 19/33 | 19/33 | 45/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 58% | 58% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | 4/13 | 14/35 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | 31% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 | 4 | 12 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/7 | 3/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 57% | 75% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLWLW
LLWLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells 1 Challenger
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Omni KumarKumar (6-76 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Learner TienTien (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Darian King/Hunter ReeseKing/Hunter Reese – Mac Kiger/Benjamin SigouinKiger/Benjamin Sigouin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Brandon HoltHolt – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
