Omni Kumar and Paul Jubb will play each other in the quarter of the Indian Wells 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on PC5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.59
Omni Kumar -> 2.23
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Omni Kumar vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Omni Kumar and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Omni Kumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-23 | 29-16 | 7-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 368, the American got to the quarter after defeating Federico Gaio 6-3 6-2 and Nishesh Basavareddy 4-6 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Basavareddy, Kumar recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Kumar scored 92 points vs Basavareddy’s 85. Omni was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kumar was unable to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Omni Kumar lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kumar put 52% of his first serves in, winning 81% (39/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (19/44) on the 2nd serve. Kumar broke Basavareddy 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kumar has dropped 1 set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Kumar has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (231-131). 2-0 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kumar has an overall227-121 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Omni has an overall 2-0 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger
Kumar has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 607, the Brit reached the quarter after beating Patrick Brady 6-3 6-0 and Stefan Kozlov 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Kozlov, Paul recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match Jubb scored 91 points vs Kozlov’s 80. Paul was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 60% of his first serves in, winning 64% (32/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. Paul broke Kozlov 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Jubb has an aggregate 4-2 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kumar | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 43 |
| Pts | 153-128 | 154-121 |
| Total Points | 281 | 275 |
| Winners | 62 | 55 |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% |
Both Kumar and Jubb played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Omni Kumar surrendered 1 set, while Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Kumar and Jubb have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Kumar played 2 games more than Jubb. The American scored 62 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Jubb bagged 55 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kumar | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1.5 |
| 1st in | 76/142 | 79/125 |
| %1st in | 54% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 62/76 | 55/79 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 33/66 | 26/46 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 57% |
Kumar scored 4 aces (2 per match). Jubb blasted 3 aces (1.5 per match). Kumar won 82% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kumar | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 10 |
| Converted | 7/18 | 10/22 |
| % Converted | 39% | 45% |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 60% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The American broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Jubb broke his opponents 10 times with a 45% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kumar | ||||
| R1 Gaio |
R2 Basavareddy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 28 | 45 | |
| pts | 61-43 | 92-85 | 153-128 | |
| Total points | 104 | 177 | 281 | |
| Winners | 23 | 39 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/50 | 48/92 | 76/142 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 52% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 39/48 | 62/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 81% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 19/44 | 33/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 43% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 4/8 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 50% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Jubb | ||||
| R1 Brady |
R2 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 28 | 43 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 91-80 | 154-121 | |
| Total points | 104 | 171 | 275 | |
| Winners | 23 | 32 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 35% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 29/42 | 50/83 | 79/125 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 60% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 32/50 | 55/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 64% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 19/33 | 26/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 58% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | 10/22 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 57% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWWWL
LLWLWWLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Brandon HoltHolt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
