Paul Jubb and Stefan Kozlov will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Indian Wells 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on PC4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.22
Stefan Kozlov -> 3.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Stefan Kozlov
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Stefan Kozlov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-17 | 20-7 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 607, Jubb reached the 2nd round after beating Patrick Brady 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Brady (6-3 6-0). During the match, Jubb scored 63 points vs Brady’s 41. Paul was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jubb bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Paul Jubb was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jubb broke Brady 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Jubb has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (172-73). 1-0 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Jubb has a composed94-35 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Paul has a compiled 3-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger
Paul has never competed in this tournament before.
Stefan Kozlov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-14 | 5-5 | 17-8 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-12 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-34 | 14-18 | 0-5 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-15 | 20-12 | 5-2 | 16-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-13 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 786, Stefan reached the 2nd round after beating Ezekiel Clark 2-6 7-67 6-4, Edan Leshem 7-5 6-3 and Gabriel Debru 6-1 3-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Stefan defeated Debru (6-1 3-6 6-2). During the match Kozlov scored 96 points vs Debru’s 88. Kozlov was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Kozlov scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Stefan Kozlov lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Kozlov put 69% of his first serves in, winning 64% (39/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the 2nd serve. Kozlov broke Debru 5 times after converting 31% of his break points (5/16).
The American has a compiled 3-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Kozlov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 76 |
| Pts | 63-41 | 284-264 |
| Total Points | 104 | 548 |
| Winners | 23 | 105 |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% |
Jubb played 1 match while Kozlov competed in 3 matches. Kozlov started his run from the qualifications while Jubb had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Stefan Kozlov dropped 2 sets while Paul Jubb hasn’t conceded a set so far. Jubb has played 6 set(s) less than Kozlov (2 vs 8). Therefore, Jubb played 61 games less than Kozlov. Paul scored 23 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Kozlov blasted 105 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Kozlov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 29/42 | 160/251 |
| %1st in | 69% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 105/160 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 41/91 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 45% |
Jubb made 2 aces . Kozlov scored 9 aces (3 per match). Jubb won 79% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Kozlov won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Kozlov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 16 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 16/41 |
| % Converted | 45% | 39% |
| Conceded | 1 | 24 |
| Saved | 1 | 12 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 12 |
The Brit broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Paul extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. The American broke his opponents 16 times with a 39% conversion rate. Kozlov conceded his serve 12 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | |||
| R1 Brady |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 63-41 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/42 | 29/42 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 23/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kozlov | |||||
| Q1 Clark |
Q3 Leshem |
R1 Debru |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-67 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 21 | 24 | 76 | |
| pts | 105-113 | 83-63 | 96-88 | 284-264 | |
| Total points | 218 | 146 | 184 | 548 | |
| Winners | 35 | 31 | 39 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 37% | 41% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 61/103 | 38/60 | 61/88 | 160/251 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 69% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 35/61 | 31/38 | 39/61 | 105/160 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 82% | 64% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/42 | 10/22 | 14/27 | 41/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 45% | 52% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 5/13 | 5/16 | 16/41 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 38% | 31% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 8 | 4 | 24 | |
| Saved | 5/12 | 5/8 | 2/4 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 42% | 63% | 50% | 155% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLLWL
LWLLLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Indian Wells 1 Challenger
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Benjamin LockLock (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Brandon HoltHolt – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Learner TienTien – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-2 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Tim HandelHandel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Brandon HoltHolt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
