Giovanni Oradini and Learner Tien will face off in the 2nd round of the Indian Wells 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on PC4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Learner Tien who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Learner Tien is the pick to win this match.
Learner Tien -> 1.41
Giovanni Oradini -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Giovanni Oradini vs. Learner Tien
There is no head to head record between Giovanni Oradini and Learner Tien since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Giovanni Oradini
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-10 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-33 | 5-6 | 32-19 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 62-30 | 27-11 | 25-11 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-10 | 13-5 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 400, the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Sebastian Fanselow 6-3 7-61.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Fanselow (6-3 7-61). During the match, Oradini scored 79 points vs Fanselow’s 69. Oradini was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Oradini fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Giovanni Oradini was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (39/55) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Fanselow twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Oradini has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 65% of his matches (157-85). 1-0 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Oradini has an overall47-23 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
The Italian has an overall 2-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
Learner Tien
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-3 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 473, Learner got to the 2nd round after defeating Maxwell Mckennon 6-2 3-6 6-0.
In the 1st round, Tien defeated Mckennon (6-2 3-6 6-0). During the match Tien scored 84 points vs Mckennon’s 65. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Tien fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Learner Tien lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Tien put 56% of his first serves in, winning 69% (27/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Mckennon 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
The American has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Oradini | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 23 |
| Pts | 79-69 | 84-65 |
| Total Points | 148 | 149 |
| Winners | 39 | 27 |
| %Winners | 49% | 32% |
Both Oradini and Tien played 1 match. At the moment, Learner Tien lost 1 set while Giovanni Oradini hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Oradini has played 1 set(s) less than Tien (2 vs 3). Therefore, Oradini played 1 game less than Tien. Oradini scored 39 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Learner made 27 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Oradini | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 55/81 | 39/70 |
| %1st in | 68% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 27/39 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 55% |
Oradini bagged 2 aces . Tien bagged 3 aces . Oradini won 71% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Tien won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Oradini | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 40% | 67% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Oradini broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Italian pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Oradini | |||
| R1 Fanselow |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 79-69 | 79-69 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 55/81 | 55/81 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Tien | |||
| R1 Mckennon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 84-65 | 84-65 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/70 | 39/70 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWWLW
LLWWLWW Tennis Scores in Indian Wells 1 Challenger
- Paul JubbJubb – Patrick BradyBrady (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Omni KumarKumar – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 5-2) – See score progression
- Tim HandelHandel – James TracyTracy (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Yshai OlielOliel (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-1 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Blaise BicknellBicknell (6-2 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Aidan MayoMayo (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Vasek PospisilPospisil (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Evan ZhuZhu (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Benjamin LockLock – Lucas GerchGerch (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Patrick BradyBrady (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-1 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Maxwell MckennonMckennon (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 5-2) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-3 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Tim HandelHandel – James TracyTracy (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Tim HandelHandel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
