James Tracy and Noah Rubin will face off in the qualifications of the Indian Wells 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on PC5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Noah Rubin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Noah Rubin is the pick to win this match.
Noah Rubin -> 1.45
James Tracy -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Tracy vs. Noah Rubin
There is no head to head record between James Tracy and Noah Rubin since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
James Tracy
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-9 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-5 | 11-3 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 8-7 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 691, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Darian King 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications, Tracy had a good straight sets win against King (7-5 6-1). During the match, Tracy scored 81 points vs King’s 63. Tracy was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tracy couldn’t to score even 1 ace and he committed only 1 double fault. James Tracy lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Tracy put 63% of his first serves in, winning 65% (34/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the 2nd serve. Tracy broke King 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Tracy has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 68% of his matches (25-12). 1-0 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tracy has a compiled16-5 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
The American has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger
Tracy has never competed in this tournament before.
Noah Rubin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-14 | 3-6 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-9 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-9 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 734, Rubin reached the qualifications after beating Kyle Kang 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Noah had a good straight sets win against Kang (6-3 6-2). During the match Rubin scored 58 points vs Kang’s 41. Rubin was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Rubin blasted 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Noah Rubin was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (31/39) of his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Noah broke Kang 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Noah has an overall 3-1 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tracy | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 |
| Pts | 81-63 | 58-41 |
| Total Points | 144 | 99 |
| Winners | 34 | 31 |
| %Winners | 42% | 53% |
Both Tracy and Rubin played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Tracy and Rubin have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Tracy played 2 games more than Rubin. Tracy scored 34 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Rubin managed to score 31 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tracy | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 52/82 | 39/51 |
| %1st in | 63% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 34/52 | 31/39 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 7/12 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 58% |
Tracy didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Rubin bagged 4 aces . Tracy won 65% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Rubin won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tracy | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 67% | 43% |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 88% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. James surrendered his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Rubin broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Noah was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Tracy | |||
| Q1 King |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 81-63 | 81-63 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 52/82 | 52/82 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 34/52 | 34/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 16/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Rubin | |||
| Q1 Kang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-41 | 58-41 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 39/51 | 39/51 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 31/39 | 31/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLWWLL
LLWLWWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Omni KumarKumar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ajeet RaiRai – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
