Daria Snigur and Maddison Inglis will face off in the qualifications of the Australian Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:30 pm on Court 13. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daria Snigur who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daria Snigur is the pick to win this match.
Daria Snigur -> 1.55
Maddison Inglis -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daria Snigur vs. Maddison Inglis
There is no head to head record between Daria Snigur and Maddison Inglis since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Daria Snigur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-22 | 22-12 | 1-1 | 7-3 | 7-4 | 5-2 |
| 2023 | 39-25 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 14-8 | 6-5 | 5-2 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 13-12 | 3-2 | 14-9 | 5-3 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 32-17 | 18-9 | 1-2 | 9-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 6-9 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, the Ukrainian reached the qualifications after beating Sinja Kraus 6-3 6-0 and Ann Li 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Daria had a good straight sets win against Li (6-4 6-2). During the match, Snigur scored 65 points vs Li’s 56. Snigur was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Snigur was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and she was very solid in conceding no double faults. Daria Snigur lost the serve 4 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Snigur put 79% of her first serves in, winning 52% (24/46) of the points behind her 1st serve and 42% (5/12) on the 2nd serve. The Ukrainian broke Li 7 times after converting 64% of her break points (7/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Snigur started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 59% of the points she played.
Snigur has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 65% of her matches (174-92). 4-1 on hard in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Snigur has an overall93-39 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Daria has a composed 4-1 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the Australian Open
Maddison Inglis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-24 | 36-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-6 | 11-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283, Inglis got to the qualifications after beating Nuria Parrizas-Diaz 4-6 6-3 7-5 and Katarina Zavatska 7-63 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Zavatska (7-63 6-3). During the match Inglis scored 78 points vs Zavatska’s 68. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Inglis managed to score 6 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Maddison Inglis lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Inglis put 59% of her first serves in, winning 72% (28/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Maddison broke Zavatska 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Inglis started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points she played.
The Australian has a compiled 2-1 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the Australian Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Snigur | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 53 |
| Pts | 126-89 | 174-158 |
| Total Points | 215 | 332 |
| Winners | 53 | 65 |
| %Winners | 42% | 37% |
Both Snigur and Inglis played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Maddison Inglis surrendered 1 set while Daria Snigur hasn’t dropped a set so far. Snigur has played 1 set(s) less than Inglis (4 vs 5). Therefore, Snigur played 20 games less than Inglis. The Ukrainian scored 53 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 65 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Snigur | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 0.5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 89/113 | 97/161 |
| %1st in | 79% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 53/89 | 65/97 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 34/64 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 53% |
Snigur struck 1 ace (0.5 per match). Inglis also managed to score 8 aces (4 per match). Snigur won 60% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Inglis won 67% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Snigur | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 9 |
| Converted | 12/18 | 9/15 |
| % Converted | 67% | 60% |
| Conceded | 11 | 13 |
| Saved | 6 | 6 |
| % Saved | 55% | 46% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 7 |
The Ukrainian broke her opponents 12 times with a 67% conversion rate. Daria conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded. Maddison broke her opponents 9 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Australian conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 46% of the break points that she conceded.
| Snigur | ||||
| Q1 Kraus |
Q2 Li |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 33 | |
| pts | 61-33 | 65-56 | 126-89 | |
| Total points | 94 | 121 | 215 | |
| Winners | 29 | 24 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 37% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 43/55 | 46/58 | 89/113 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 29/43 | 24/46 | 53/89 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 52% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 5/12 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 42% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 7/11 | 12/18 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 64% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 2/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 33% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Inglis | ||||
| Q1 Parrizas-Diaz |
Q2 Zavatska |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 22 | 53 | |
| pts | 96-90 | 78-68 | 174-158 | |
| Total points | 186 | 146 | 332 | |
| Winners | 37 | 28 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 58/95 | 39/66 | 97/161 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 59% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 37/58 | 28/39 | 65/97 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 72% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/37 | 13/27 | 34/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 48% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/9 | 9/15 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 44% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 | 13 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 0/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 0% | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWLL
LWWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores – Australian Open
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Dzmitry ZhyrmontZhyrmont (3-6 6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Saketh-Sai MyneniMyneni – Konstantin KravchukKravchuk (4-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pavel KotovKotov – Yaraslav ShylaShyla (6-75 6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Arjun KadheKadhe (6-1 3-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Destanee AiavaAiava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Julia RieraRiera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – Rebecca MarinoMarino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Sofia KeninKenin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Angelique KerberKerber (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Clara TausonTauson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Emma NavarroNavarro – Xiyu WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena RybakinaRybakina – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Arantxa RusRus (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emma RaducanuRaducanu – Shelby RogersRogers (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Oceane DodinDodin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandra KrunicKrunic – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Nao HibinoHibino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Claire LiuLiu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Elise MertensMertens (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Caroline WozniackiWozniacki (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Cori GauffGauff (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Emina BektasBektas (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Diane ParryParry – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Donna VekicVekic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (1-1) – H2H and prediction
