Botic Van De Zandschulp and Alejandro Tabilo will face off in the 2nd round of the ASB Classic for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 7:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.51
Alejandro Tabilo -> 2.57
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Alejandro Tabilo
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Alejandro Tabilo play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Van De Zandschulp won 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Zagreb Challenger back in 2021.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 59, the Dutch got to the 2nd round after defeating Christopher Eubanks 7-65 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Eubanks (7-65 6-2). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 77 points vs Eubanks’s 55. Botic was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp was pretty efficient on serve to win 89% (25/28) of his 1st serve and 74% (20/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Eubanks twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (315-175). 2-1 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has an overall 54-33 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 2-1 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Auckland
Botic has never competed in this tournament before.
Alejandro Tabilo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-27 | 13-8 | 15-10 | 3-7 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-26 | 13-5 | 39-19 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-22 | 7-6 | 23-11 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-30 | 13-9 | 22-15 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-11 | 5-2 | 11-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 82, Alejandro reached the 2nd round after beating Isaac Becroft 6-0 6-1, Patrick Kypson 7-63 6-3 and Borna Gojo 1-6 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round against Gojo, The Chilean recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Tabilo scored 76 points vs Gojo’s 64. Alejandro was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Tabilo blasted 10 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Alejandro Tabilo was very efficient on serve to win 75% (33/44) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Chilean was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Gojo 3 times.
Tabilo has an aggregate 3-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Tabilo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 59 |
| Pts | 77-55 | 196-140 |
| Total Points | 132 | 336 |
| Winners | 25 | 90 |
| %Winners | 32% | 46% |
Van De Zandschulp played 1 match while Tabilo competed in 3 matches. Tabilo started his run from the qualifications while Van De Zandschulp had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Alejandro Tabilo conceded 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 5 set(s) less than Tabilo (2 vs 7). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 38 games less than Tabilo. Van De Zandschulp scored 25 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Alejandro fired 90 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Tabilo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 34 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 11.3 |
| 1st in | 28/55 | 108/158 |
| %1st in | 51% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 90/108 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 20/27 | 34/50 |
| %2nd pts | 74% | 68% |
Van De Zandschulp recorded 6 aces . Tabilo made 34 aces (11.3 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 89% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Tabilo won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Tabilo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 9 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 9/17 |
| % Converted | 33% | 53% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Botic extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Chilean broke his opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Tabilo conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Eubanks |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 77-55 | 77-55 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 28/55 | 28/55 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/27 | 20/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Tabilo | |||||
| Q1 Becroft |
Q3 Kypson |
R1 Gojo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | 7-63 6-3 | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 22 | 24 | 59 | |
| pts | 52-23 | 68-53 | 76-64 | 196-140 | |
| Total points | 75 | 121 | 140 | 336 | |
| Winners | 22 | 35 | 33 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 51% | 43% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 13 | 10 | 34 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 24/38 | 40/56 | 44/64 | 108/158 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 71% | 69% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 35/40 | 33/44 | 90/108 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 88% | 75% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 14/16 | 13/20 | 34/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 88% | 65% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 1/6 | 3/3 | 9/17 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 17% | 100% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWLL
LWLWLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Auckland
- Max PurcellPurcell – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Richard GasquetGasquet (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (0-6 7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Marcos GironGiron (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Marcel Granollers/Horacio ZeballosGranollers/Horacio Zeballos – Marcus Daniell/Ben McLachlanDaniell/Ben McLachlan (6-3 2-6 10-7) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Gael MonfilsMonfils (6-4 6-76 7-64) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Borna GojoGojo (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Jeff WolfWolf (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Richard GasquetGasquet (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Taro DanielDaniel – Max PurcellPurcell (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
