Emma Navarro and Petra Martic will clash against each other in the quarter of the ASB Classic for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:00 pm on Stadium. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emma Navarro who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emma Navarro is the pick to win this match.
Emma Navarro -> 1.77
Petra Martic -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emma Navarro vs. Petra Martic
This will be the 2nd time that Emma Navarro and Petra Martic fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Martic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Martic won 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the 1st round in Cincinnati back in 2023.
Emma Navarro
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-8 | 21-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 64-24 | 17-9 | 37-11 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-18 | 8-8 | 23-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-13 | 6-6 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 31 (career-high), Emma reached the quarter after defeating Linda Fruhvirtova 2-6 6-4 6-2 and Elina Avanesyan 6-1 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Emma had a good straight sets win against Avanesyan (6-1 6-2). During the match, Navarro scored 65 points vs Avanesyan’s 47. Emma was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Navarro scored just 1 ace throughout the match and she committed only 2 double faults. Emma Navarro lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Navarro put 66% of her first serves in, winning 76% (28/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (7/19) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Avanesyan 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points she played.
Navarro has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 63% of her matches (151-87). 2-0 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Navarro has an aggregate40-36 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The American has an overall 2-0 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Auckland
Emma has never competed in this tournament before.
Petra Martic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-8 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-22 | 8-13 | 6-4 | 5-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-21 | 11-10 | 18-6 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-21 | 7-12 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 41, Martic reached the quarter after defeating Rebeka Masarova 3-6 6-3 6-3 and Yue Yuan 6-2 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Petra had a good straight sets win against Yuan (6-2 6-2). During the match Martic scored 61 points vs Yuan’s 37. The Croatian was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Martic recorded 6 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Petra Martic was pretty effective on serve to win 100% (22/22) of her 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Croatian broke Yuan 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points she played.
Petra has an aggregate 2-0 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Navarro | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 43 |
| Pts | 162-140 | 152-119 |
| Total Points | 302 | 271 |
| Winners | 61 | 52 |
| %Winners | 38% | 34% |
Both Navarro and Martic played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Emma Navarro dropped 1 set, while Petra Martic conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Navarro and Martic have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Navarro played 2 games less than Martic. Emma scored 61 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Croatian scored 52 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Navarro | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1.5 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 89/133 | 72/117 |
| %1st in | 67% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 61/89 | 52/72 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 19/44 | 30/45 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 67% |
Navarro recorded 3 aces (1.5 per match). Martic recorded 11 aces (5.5 per match). Navarro won 69% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Martic won 72% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Navarro | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 8 |
| Converted | 10/20 | 8/21 |
| % Converted | 50% | 38% |
| Conceded | 12 | 6 |
| Saved | 7 | 4 |
| % Saved | 58% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The American broke her opponents 10 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American dropped her serve 5 times and she saved 58% of the break points that she conceded. The Croatian broke her opponents 8 times with a 38% conversion rate. Petra conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Navarro | ||||
| R1 Fruhvirtova |
R2 Avanesyan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 15 | 41 | |
| pts | 97-93 | 65-47 | 162-140 | |
| Total points | 190 | 112 | 302 | |
| Winners | 33 | 28 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 43% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 52/77 | 37/56 | 89/133 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 66% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 33/52 | 28/37 | 61/89 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 76% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 7/19 | 19/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 37% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/8 | 10/20 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 63% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 3 | 12 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 2/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 67% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Martic | ||||
| R1 Masarova |
R2 Yuan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 16 | 43 | |
| pts | 91-82 | 61-37 | 152-119 | |
| Total points | 173 | 98 | 271 | |
| Winners | 30 | 22 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 36% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 50/78 | 22/39 | 72/117 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 56% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 30/50 | 22/22 | 52/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 100% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/28 | 10/17 | 30/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 59% | 67% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/9 | 8/21 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 44% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 0/0 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWLWWLWW
LLLLWLWLLL Tennis Scores in Auckland
- Marie Bouzkova/Bethanie Mattek-SandsBouzkova/Bethanie Mattek-Sands – Paige Mary Hourigan/Erin RoutliffeMary Hourigan/Erin Routliffe (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Tom JombyJomby (3-6 6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jason JungJung – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-2 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Collin AltamiranoAltamirano – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dayne KellyKelly – Tommy PaulPaul (1-6 7-65 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cori GauffGauff – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emma NavarroNavarro – Petra MarticMartic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Diane ParryParry (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (1-2) – H2H and prediction
