Brandon Nakashima and Dino Prizmic will face off in the 2nd round of the Canberra Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Nakashima who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Nakashima is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.43
Dino Prizmic -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Nakashima vs. Dino Prizmic
There is no head to head record between Brandon Nakashima and Dino Prizmic since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Brandon Nakashima
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-12 | 11-4 | 10-4 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-26 | 9-15 | 3-4 | 8-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 17-13 | 5-5 | 9-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-25 | 17-10 | 4-7 | 20-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-14 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 134, Brandon reached the 2nd round after beating Alexandre Muller 5-7 7-67 7-65.
In the 1st round against Muller, Brandon recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-67 7-65).During the match, Nakashima scored less points (5) than Muller. In fact, the world no. 134 won 120 points vs Muller’s. That means that Nakashima was more focused during the important points. The American was quite aggressive to blast 63 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nakashima buried his opponent with 20 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Brandon Nakashima lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Nakashima put 62% of his first serves in, winning 82% (63/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (21/47) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Muller once after converting 10% of his break points (1/10).
Nakashima has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (166-108). 1-0 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nakashima has a compiled85-57 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
The American has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Canberra Challenger
Brandon has never competed in this tournament before.
Dino Prizmic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-6 | 4-2 | 1-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-19 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-9 | 21-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178, the Croatian reached the 2nd round after defeating Radu Albot 6-74 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round against Albot, Prizmic recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-1 6-2). During the match Prizmic scored 100 points vs Albot’s 82. The Croatian was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Prizmic blasted 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Dino Prizmic was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (39/49) of his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Croatian broke Albot 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Prizmic has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nakashima | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 38 | 28 |
| Pts | 120-125 | 100-82 |
| Total Points | 245 | 182 |
| Winners | 63 | 39 |
| %Winners | 53% | 39% |
Both Nakashima and Prizmic played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Brandon Nakashima dropped 1 set, while Dino Prizmic lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Nakashima and Prizmic have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Nakashima played 10 games more than Prizmic. Nakashima scored 63 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Dino managed to score 39 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nakashima | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 20 | 9 |
| 1st in | 77/124 | 49/83 |
| %1st in | 62% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 63/77 | 39/49 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 21/47 | 20/34 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 59% |
Nakashima struck 20 aces . Prizmic managed to score 9 aces . Nakashima won 82% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Prizmic won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nakashima | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 5 |
| Converted | 1/10 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 10% | 45% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 60% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent once with a 10% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Croatian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Nakashima | |||
| R1 Muller |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-67 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 38 | 38 | |
| pts | 120-125 | 120-125 | |
| Total points | 245 | 245 | |
| Winners | 63 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 20 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 77/124 | 77/124 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 63/77 | 63/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/47 | 21/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/10 | 1/10 | |
| Converted % | 10% | 10% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Prizmic | |||
| R1 Albot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 100-82 | 100-82 | |
| Total points | 182 | 182 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 49/83 | 49/83 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 39/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 20/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWWLWWLW
LWLLWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Canberra Challenger
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Alex MolcanMolcan (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Casey HooleHoole (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Sumit NagalNagal (6-71 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Emilio NavaNava (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-74 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Pavle MarinkovMarinkov – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- David GoffinGoffin – Adam WaltonWalton (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Alexandre MullerMuller (5-7 7-67 7-65) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Andrew Harris/Matthew Christopher RomiosHarris/Matthew Christopher Romios – Anirudh Chandrasekar/N. Vijay Sundar PrashanthChandrasekar/N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth (4-6 6-4 10-8) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Filip MisolicMisolic (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – David GoffinGoffin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
