Makoto Ochi and Jake Delaney will play each other in the qualifications of the Noumea Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT N’GODRELA. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Makoto Ochi who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Makoto Ochi is the pick to win this match.
Makoto Ochi -> 1.41
Jake Delaney -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Makoto Ochi vs. Jake Delaney
This will be the 2nd time that Makoto Ochi and Jake Delaney play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Ochi (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Ochi won 6-0 6-1 in the 2nd round in China F6 back in 2016.
Makoto Ochi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-11 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-27 | 26-25 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-24 | 33-21 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-17 | 17-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 486, Ochi got to the qualifications after defeating Louam Boivin 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Makoto had a good straight sets win against Boivin (6-0 6-0). During the match, Ochi scored 49 points vs Boivin’s 11. Makoto was extremely aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ochi made 3 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Makoto Ochi was pretty effective on serve to win 94% (16/17) of his 1st serve and 80% (8/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Japanese broke Boivin 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Ochi has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (205-164). 26-25 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ochi has a compiled 160-124 match record in the last years on hard.
Makoto’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Tainan,M25 Takasaki and M25 Gold Coast.
Makoto has a composed 30-27 win-loss record in 2023, 26-25 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Noumea Challenger
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
Jake Delaney
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-15 | 16-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-27 | 34-21 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 8-10 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 514, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Samuel Brosset 5-7 7-62 6-2.
In the qualifications against Brosset, Jake recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-62 6-2). During the match Delaney scored 106 points vs Brosset’s 96. Delaney was pretty aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about serving, Delaney fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jake Delaney lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Delaney put 70% of his first serves in, winning 66% (47/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the 2nd serve. Jake broke Brosset 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The Australian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Darwin and M25 Cairns.
Jake has a compiled 38-27 win-loss record in 2023, 34-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ochi | Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 33 |
| Pts | 49-11 | 106-96 |
| Total Points | 60 | 202 |
| Winners | 16 | 47 |
| %Winners | 33% | 44% |
Both Ochi and Delaney played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jake Delaney conceded 1 set while Makoto Ochi hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ochi has played 1 set(s) less than Delaney (2 vs 3). Therefore, Ochi played 21 games less than Delaney. Ochi scored 16 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian fired 47 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ochi | Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 17/27 | 71/101 |
| %1st in | 63% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 16/17 | 47/71 |
| %1st pts | 94% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 8/10 | 19/30 |
| %2nd pts | 80% | 63% |
Ochi struck 3 aces . Delaney bagged 2 aces . Ochi won 94% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 80% of the points. On the other side, Delaney won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ochi | Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 75% | 40% |
| Conceded | 0 | 12 |
| Saved | 0 | 9 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Ochi broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Japanese pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Delaney broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ochi | |||
| Q1 Boivin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 49-11 | 49-11 | |
| Total points | 60 | 60 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 17/27 | 17/27 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 16/17 | 16/17 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Delaney | |||
| Q1 Brosset |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 106-96 | 106-96 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 71/101 | 71/101 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 47/71 | 47/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLLWWLLW
WLWWWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jose StathamStatham – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Titouan DroguetDroguet (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – Jake DelaneyDelaney (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Benoit PairePaire (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Jesse DelaneyDelaney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Maxime ChazalChazal (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (2-0) – H2H and prediction
