Thomas Fancutt and Moerani Bouzige will square off in the qualifications of the Noumea Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT HERTZ. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Moerani Bouzige who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Moerani Bouzige is the pick to win this match.
Moerani Bouzige -> 1.75
Thomas Fancutt -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thomas Fancutt vs. Moerani Bouzige
There is no head to head record between Thomas Fancutt and Moerani Bouzige since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Thomas Fancutt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-20 | 18-17 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-1 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-23 | 28-18 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-18 | 16-15 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 479, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Marek Jaloviec 6-2 4-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, Fancutt defeated Jaloviec (6-2 4-6 7-5). During the match, Fancutt scored 106 points vs Jaloviec’s 86. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fancutt struck 17 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 12 double faults. Thomas Fancutt lost the serve 3 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Fancutt put 50% of his first serves in, winning 79% (38/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. Thomas broke Jaloviec 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Fancutt has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 54% of his matches (163-140). 18-17 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Fancutt has an aggregate119-106 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Swan Hill.
Thomas has an aggregate 28-20 win-loss record in 2023, 18-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Noumea Challenger
Moerani Bouzige
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-17 | 21-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-36 | 33-27 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-19 | 13-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-4 | 21-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 687, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Blake Bayldon 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Bayldon (6-2 6-3). During the match Bouzige scored 67 points vs Bayldon’s 46. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Bouzige scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Moerani Bouzige was quite efficient on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Bouzige broke Bayldon 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Bouzige’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat,M25 Darwin and M25 Hua Hin.
Moerani has an aggregate 36-36 win-loss record in 2023, 33-27 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fancutt | Bouzige |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 17 |
| Pts | 106-86 | 67-46 |
| Total Points | 192 | 113 |
| Winners | 38 | 25 |
| %Winners | 36% | 37% |
Both Fancutt and Bouzige played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Thomas Fancutt dropped 1 set while Moerani Bouzige hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Fancutt has played 1 set more than Bouzige (3 vs 2). Therefore, Fancutt played 13 games more than Bouzige. Fancutt scored 38 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian recorded 25 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fancutt | Bouzige |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 17 | 1 |
| 1st in | 48/96 | 30/47 |
| %1st in | 50% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 38/48 | 25/30 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 11/17 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 65% |
Fancutt bagged 17 aces . Bouzige made 1 ace . Fancutt won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Bouzige won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fancutt | Bouzige |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 45% | 33% |
| Conceded | 14 | 0 |
| Saved | 11 | 0 |
| % Saved | 79% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Thomas broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Thomas surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Bouzige broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Bouzige was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Fancutt | |||
| Q1 Jaloviec |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 106-86 | 106-86 | |
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 12 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 48/96 | 48/96 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 38/48 | 38/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 11/14 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Bouzige | |||
| Q1 Bayldon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-46 | 67-46 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 30/47 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWWLWL
LWLWWLWLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jose StathamStatham – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Titouan DroguetDroguet (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – Jake DelaneyDelaney (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Benoit PairePaire (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Jesse DelaneyDelaney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Maxime ChazalChazal (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (2-0) – H2H and prediction
