![Prediction And Head To Head Matteo Gigante Vs. Matthew Dellavedova 3dlpcakn0s Prediction and head to head Matteo Gigante vs. Matthew Dellavedova](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Matteo-Gigante-vs.-Matthew-Dellavedova-3dlpCaKN0S.jpg)
Matteo Gigante and Matthew Dellavedova will play each other in the qualifications of the Canberra Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matteo Gigante who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matteo Gigante is the pick to win this match.
Matteo Gigante -> 1.27
Matthew Dellavedova -> 3.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matteo Gigante vs. Matthew Dellavedova
There is no head to head record between Matteo Gigante and Matthew Dellavedova since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Matteo Gigante
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-13 | 18-3 | 9-7 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-29 | 10-5 | 19-18 | 1-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-20 | 9-1 | 27-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-15 | 2-2 | 16-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, Gigante got to the qualifications after defeating Edward Winter 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Gigante had a good straight sets win against Winter (6-4 6-4). During the match, Gigante scored 67 points vs Winter’s 49. Matteo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gigante blasted 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Matteo Gigante was pretty efficient on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 79% (11/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Gigante broke Winter twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Gigante has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 57% of his matches (101-76). 10-5 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Gigante has a compiled22-9 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Tenerife 3 Challenger where he defeated Stefano Travaglia in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Cordenons Challenger where he defeated Lukas Neumayer in the final 6-0 6-2.
Matteo has a compiled 32-29 win-loss record in 2023, 10-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Canberra Challenger
Matteo has never competed in this tournament before.
Matthew Dellavedova
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-22 | 5-10 | 19-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 55-35 | 35-17 | 15-15 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 63-40 | 56-29 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-33 | 18-18 | 14-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 495 (career-high), the Australian reached the qualifications after defeating Francesco Maestrelli 7-64 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Australian defeated Maestrelli (7-64 4-6 6-3). During the match Dellavedova scored 109 points vs Maestrelli’s 104. Matthew was quite aggressive to blast 56 winners.
Talking about serving, Dellavedova blasted 3 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Matthew Dellavedova lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Dellavedova put 76% of his first serves in, winning 68% (56/82) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the 2nd serve. Matthew broke Maestrelli once after converting 11% of his break points (1/9).
The Australian has a compiled 55-35 win-loss record in 2023, 35-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gigante | Dellavedova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 20 | 32 |
Pts | 67-49 | 109-104 |
Total Points | 116 | 213 |
Winners | 32 | 56 |
%Winners | 48% | 51% |
Both Gigante and Dellavedova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Matthew Dellavedova conceded 1 set while Matteo Gigante hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gigante has played 1 set(s) less than Dellavedova (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gigante played 12 games less than Dellavedova. The Italian scored 32 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Dellavedova scored 56 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gigante | Dellavedova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 3 |
Avg per match | 9 | 3 |
1st in | 39/53 | 82/108 |
%1st in | 74% | 76% |
1st pts | 32/39 | 56/82 |
%1st pts | 82% | 68% |
2nd pts | 11/14 | 17/26 |
%2nd pts | 79% | 65% |
Gigante made 9 aces . Dellavedova bagged 3 aces . Gigante won 82% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Dellavedova won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gigante | Dellavedova |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 1 |
Converted | 2/6 | 1/9 |
% Converted | 33% | 11% |
Conceded | 1 | 7 |
Saved | 1 | 6 |
% Saved | 100% | 86% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Gigante broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. The Italian extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Australian broke his opponent once with a 11% conversion rate. Matthew conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
Gigante | |||
Q1 Winter |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 67-49 | 67-49 | |
Total points | 116 | 116 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 39/53 | 39/53 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Dellavedova | |||
Q1 Maestrelli |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 4-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
pts | 109-104 | 109-104 | |
Total points | 213 | 213 | |
Winners | 56 | 56 | |
%Winners | 51% | 51% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 82/108 | 82/108 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
1st pts | 56/82 | 56/82 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/9 | 1/9 | |
Converted % | 11% | 11% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – David GoffinGoffin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction