Chak Lam Coleman Wong and August Holmgren will face off in the quarter of the Yokkaichi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:30 pm on SUB CENTRE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is August Holmgren who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, August Holmgren is the pick to win this match.
August Holmgren -> 1.49
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.53

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. August Holmgren

There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and August Holmgren since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
161
High
128
WLLWLWLWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 39-34 37-24 0-2 2-4 0-4 0-0
2023 53-27 42-19 9-7 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 24-19 20-12 3-5 1-2 0-0 0-0
2021 11-7 5-4 6-3 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 2-4 2-4 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 282 (career-high), Chak got to the quarter after beating Naoki Nakagawa 6-2 6-75 6-4 and Rei Sakamoto 6-3 6-2.

In the 2nd round, The had a good straight sets win against Sakamoto (6-3 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 60 points vs Sakamoto’s 39. Lam Coleman Wong was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.

Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was quite efficient on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lam Coleman Wong broke Sakamoto 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The has surrendered 1 set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.

Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (90-63). 41-18 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has an overall69-45 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.

Chak’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong,M15 Doha,the Shenzhen 2 Challenger and the Playford Challenger.

Chak has an aggregate 52-26 win-loss record in 2023, 41-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger

Yokkaichi Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong's Record

August Holmgren

August Holmgren

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
197
High
163
WWLLWLWLLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 36-24 24-12 6-6 6-6 0-0 0-0
2023 46-26 33-14 9-6 4-6 0-0 0-0
2022 31-12 18-4 10-5 3-3 0-0 0-0
2021 19-8 12-6 7-2 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 330 (career-high), the Dane got to the quarter after defeating Ryuki Tsutsumi 6-3 6-2, Kai Wehnelt 6-2 6-4, Yusuke Takahashi 6-3 6-3 and Zdenek Kolar 6-4 6-2.

In the 2nd round, The Dane had a good straight sets win against Kolar (6-4 6-2). During the match Holmgren scored 67 points vs Kolar’s 50. Holmgren was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.

About the serving games, Holmgren scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, August Holmgren was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dane broke Kolar 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Dane started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to conquer 58% of the points he played.

The Dane’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Harlingen.

Holmgren has an aggregate 46-25 win-loss record in 2023, 33-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger

The Dane has never competed in this tournament before.

Yokkaichi Challenger
Holmgren's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

C.Lam Wong
A.Holmgren
3h:20
3h:20
Time on court​
4h:26
4h:26
1h:05
1h:05
Last match​
1h:24
1h:24
2
2
Match played
!
4
4
48
48
Games Played​
71
71
5
5
Set played​​
8
8
159
159
Total points​
239
239
79.5
79.5
Avg point​
59.8
59.8
59
59
Winners
101
101
29.5
29.5
Avg Winners​
25.3
25.3
37%
37%
Ratio winners
42%
42%
-- Serve --
18
18
Aces
19
19
9
9
Avg Aces
4.8
4.8
4
4
Double Faults
13
13
2
2
Avg Double Faults
3.3
3.3
59/70
59/70
1st won total​
101/121
101/121
!
84%
84%
1st won %
!
83%
83%
40/63
40/63
2nd won total​
43/76
43/76
!
63%
63%
2nd won %
57%
57%
-- Break Points --
7/18
7/18
BP won
13/22
13/22
3.5/9
3.5/9
Avg BP won
3.3/5.5
3.3/5.5
39%
39%
Won
!
59%
59%
2
2
Conceded
3
3
1
1
Avg Conceded
0.8
0.8
1
1
Broken
1
1
!
0.5
0.5
Avg Broken
!
0.3
0.3
1
1
Saved
2
2

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Lam Coleman Wong Holmgren
Match played 2 4
Tot Set 5 8
Tot Games 48 71
Pts 159-125 239-172
Total Points 284 411
Winners 59 101
%Winners 37% 42%

Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Holmgren competed in 4 matches. Holmgren started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong dropped 1 set while August Holmgren hasn’t lost a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 3 set(s) less than Holmgren (5 vs 8). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 23 games less than Holmgren. The scored 59 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, August managed to score 101 winners (42%).

Serve Performance

Serve Lam Coleman Wong Holmgren
Aces 18 19
Avg per match 9 4.8
1st in 70/133 121/197
%1st in 53% 61%
1st pts 59/70 101/121
%1st pts 84% 83%
2nd pts 40/63 43/76
%2nd pts 63% 57%

Lam Coleman Wong fired 18 aces (9 per match). Holmgren managed to score 19 aces (4.8 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 84% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Holmgren won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Lam Coleman Wong Holmgren
Won 7 13
Converted 7/18 13/22
% Converted 39% 59%
Conceded 2 3
Saved 1 2
% Saved 50% 67%
Times Broken 1 1

The broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Chak dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. August broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. The Dane conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.

Lam Coleman Wong
R1
Nakagawa
R2
Sakamoto
Total
Score 6-2 6-75 6-4 6-3 6-2
Tot Set 3 2 5
Tot Games 31 17 48
pts 99-86 60-39 159-125
Total points 185 99 284
Winners 38 21 59
%Winners 38% 35% 37%
SERVE
Aces 10 8 18
Double Faults 3 1 4
1st in 46/86 24/47 70/133
% 1st in 53% 51% 53%
1st pts 38/46 21/24 59/70
% 1st pts 83% 88% 84%
2nd pts 24/40 16/23 40/63
% 2nd pts 60% 70% 63%
Breaks
Won 4 3 7
Converted 4/12 3/6 7/18
Converted % 33% 50% 39%
Conceded 1 1 2
Saved 0/1 1/1 1
Saved % 0% 100% 50%
Times Broken 1 0 1
Holmgren
Q1
Tsutsumi
Q3
Wehnelt
R1
Takahashi
R2
Kolar
Total
Score 6-3 6-2 6-2 6-4 6-3 6-3 6-4 6-2
Tot Set 2 2 2 2 8
Tot Games 17 18 18 18 71
pts 54-38 60-42 58-42 67-50 239-172
Total points 92 102 100 117 411
Winners 25 27 27 22 101
%Winners 46% 45% 47% 33% 42%
SERVE
Aces 1 9 8 1 19
Double Faults 5 2 2 4 13
1st in 31/51 33/46 30/47 27/53 121/197
% 1st in 61% 72% 64% 51% 61%
1st pts 25/31 27/33 27/30 22/27 101/121
% 1st pts 81% 82% 90% 81% 83%
2nd pts 11/20 9/13 9/17 14/26 43/76
% 2nd pts 55% 69% 53% 54% 57%
Breaks
Won 3 3 3 4 13
Converted 3/4 3/5 3/5 4/8 13/22
Converted % 75% 60% 60% 50% 59%
Conceded 0 0 0 3 3
Saved 0/0 0/0 0/0 2/3 2
Saved % 67% 34%
Times Broken 0 0 0 1 1

Upcoming matches in the draw