Chak Lam Coleman Wong and August Holmgren will face off in the quarter of the Yokkaichi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:30 pm on SUB CENTRE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is August Holmgren who should win in 3 sets.
August Holmgren -> 1.49
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. August Holmgren
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and August Holmgren since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 39-34 | 37-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 282 (career-high), Chak got to the quarter after beating Naoki Nakagawa 6-2 6-75 6-4 and Rei Sakamoto 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The had a good straight sets win against Sakamoto (6-3 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 60 points vs Sakamoto’s 39. Lam Coleman Wong was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was quite efficient on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lam Coleman Wong broke Sakamoto 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The has surrendered 1 set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (90-63). 41-18 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has an overall69-45 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Chak’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong,M15 Doha,the Shenzhen 2 Challenger and the Playford Challenger.
Chak has an aggregate 52-26 win-loss record in 2023, 41-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger
August Holmgren
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 36-24 | 24-12 | 6-6 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-26 | 33-14 | 9-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-12 | 18-4 | 10-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-8 | 12-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 330 (career-high), the Dane got to the quarter after defeating Ryuki Tsutsumi 6-3 6-2, Kai Wehnelt 6-2 6-4, Yusuke Takahashi 6-3 6-3 and Zdenek Kolar 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Dane had a good straight sets win against Kolar (6-4 6-2). During the match Holmgren scored 67 points vs Kolar’s 50. Holmgren was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Holmgren scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, August Holmgren was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dane broke Kolar 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dane started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to conquer 58% of the points he played.
The Dane’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Harlingen.
Holmgren has an aggregate 46-25 win-loss record in 2023, 33-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger
The Dane has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Holmgren |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 5 | 8 |
Tot Games | 48 | 71 |
Pts | 159-125 | 239-172 |
Total Points | 284 | 411 |
Winners | 59 | 101 |
%Winners | 37% | 42% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Holmgren competed in 4 matches. Holmgren started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong dropped 1 set while August Holmgren hasn’t lost a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 3 set(s) less than Holmgren (5 vs 8). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 23 games less than Holmgren. The scored 59 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, August managed to score 101 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Holmgren |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 19 |
Avg per match | 9 | 4.8 |
1st in | 70/133 | 121/197 |
%1st in | 53% | 61% |
1st pts | 59/70 | 101/121 |
%1st pts | 84% | 83% |
2nd pts | 40/63 | 43/76 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 57% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 18 aces (9 per match). Holmgren managed to score 19 aces (4.8 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 84% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Holmgren won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Holmgren |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 13 |
Converted | 7/18 | 13/22 |
% Converted | 39% | 59% |
Conceded | 2 | 3 |
Saved | 1 | 2 |
% Saved | 50% | 67% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Chak dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. August broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. The Dane conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
R1 Nakagawa | R2 Sakamoto | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-75 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 17 | 48 | |
pts | 99-86 | 60-39 | 159-125 | |
Total points | 185 | 99 | 284 | |
Winners | 38 | 21 | 59 | |
%Winners | 38% | 35% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 10 | 8 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
1st in | 46/86 | 24/47 | 70/133 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 51% | 53% | |
1st pts | 38/46 | 21/24 | 59/70 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 88% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 24/40 | 16/23 | 40/63 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 70% | 63% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 3/6 | 7/18 | |
Converted % | 33% | 50% | 39% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 0% | 100% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Holmgren | ||||||
Q1 Tsutsumi | Q3 Wehnelt | R1 Takahashi | R2 Kolar | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 71 | |
pts | 54-38 | 60-42 | 58-42 | 67-50 | 239-172 | |
Total points | 92 | 102 | 100 | 117 | 411 | |
Winners | 25 | 27 | 27 | 22 | 101 | |
%Winners | 46% | 45% | 47% | 33% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 19 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 13 | |
1st in | 31/51 | 33/46 | 30/47 | 27/53 | 121/197 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 72% | 64% | 51% | 61% | |
1st pts | 25/31 | 27/33 | 27/30 | 22/27 | 101/121 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 82% | 90% | 81% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 11/20 | 9/13 | 9/17 | 14/26 | 43/76 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 69% | 53% | 54% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 4/8 | 13/22 | |
Converted % | 75% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 59% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | – | – | – | 67% | 34% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction