Marvin Moeller and Hazem Naow will face off in the qualifications of the Danderyd Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marvin Moeller who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marvin Moeller is the pick to win this match.
Marvin Moeller -> 1.41
Hazem Naow -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marvin Moeller vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Marvin Moeller and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Marvin Moeller
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-18 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 59-27 | 2-1 | 36-16 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
2022 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 29-26 | 1-5 | 12-9 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 6-4 |
2020 | 14-7 | 6-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
Ranked no. 318 (career-high), Marvin reached the qualifications after defeating Yaroslav Demin 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Moeller had a good straight sets win against Demin (6-3 6-4). During the match, Moeller scored 66 points vs Demin’s 48. Marvin was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about the service games, Moeller struck 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Marvin Moeller was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (17/23) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Marvin broke Demin 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Moeller has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (160-94). 19-7 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Moeller has an overall54-30 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Marvin’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Creteil,M15 Sofia,M25 Uriage,M25 Ystad and M25 Nevers.
Moeller has a compiled 58-26 win-loss record in 2023, 19-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Danderyd Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Hazem Naow
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|
Ranked no. 563, Naow got to the qualifications after beating Mohamed Safwat 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Hazem had a good straight sets win against Safwat (6-0 6-1). During the match Naow scored 55 points vs Safwat’s 28. The Syrian was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
About the serving games, Naow made 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hazem Naow was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (17/23) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Naow was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Safwat 5 times.
The Syrian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island and M15 Trier.
Naow has an overall 39-22 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Moeller | Naow |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 13 |
Pts | 66-48 | 55-28 |
Total Points | 114 | 83 |
Winners | 17 | 17 |
%Winners | 26% | 31% |
Both Moeller and Naow played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Moeller and Naow have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Moeller played 6 games more than Naow. Marvin scored 17 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, Hazem recorded 17 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Moeller | Naow |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 3 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
1st in | 23/49 | 23/46 |
%1st in | 47% | 50% |
1st pts | 17/23 | 17/23 |
%1st pts | 74% | 74% |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 15/23 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 65% |
Moeller struck 2 aces . Naow fired 3 aces . Moeller won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Moeller | Naow |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/5 |
% Converted | 83% | 100% |
Conceded | 4 | 1 |
Saved | 2 | 1 |
% Saved | 50% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Marvin broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Moeller dropped his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Naow broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Hazem was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Moeller | |||
Q1 Demin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 66-48 | 66-48 | |
Total points | 114 | 114 | |
Winners | 17 | 17 | |
%Winners | 26% | 26% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 23/49 | 23/49 | |
% 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
1st pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Naow | |||
Q1 Safwat |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
pts | 55-28 | 55-28 | |
Total points | 83 | 83 | |
Winners | 17 | 17 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 23/46 | 23/46 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
1st pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Petr NouzaNouza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Karl FribergFriberg (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Maximilian MartererMarterer (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian OetzbachOetzbach – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Corentin MoutetMoutet (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-1) – H2H and prediction