Giles Hussey and Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar will play each other in the qualifications of the Calgary Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 8. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Giles Hussey who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Giles Hussey is the pick to win this match.
Giles Hussey -> 1.144
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar -> 5.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Giles Hussey vs. Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
This will be the 2nd time that Giles Hussey and Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Hussey (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Hussey won 7-5 6-1 in the 2nd round in Augustin back in October 2023.
Giles Hussey
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-19 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 18-7 | 0-3 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 12-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-15 | 23-10 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 520, Giles reached the qualifications after defeating Piotr Matuszewski 6-1 4-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Giles defeated Matuszewski (6-1 4-6 6-4). During the match, Hussey scored 88 points vs Matuszewski’s 70. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hussey fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Giles Hussey lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Hussey put 58% of his first serves in, winning 79% (33/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. Giles broke Matuszewski 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Hussey has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 62% of his matches (108-66). 16-5 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Hussey has an aggregate28-13 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Budapest,M15 Danderyd and M25 Edmonton.
Giles has a composed 32-18 win-loss record in 2023, 16-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Calgary Challenger
Hussey has never competed in this tournament before.
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-13 | 14-6 | 3-2 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-24 | 7-10 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-11 | 1-5 | 12-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-3 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 799, the Canadian got to the qualifications after beating Nicaise Muamba 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Muamba (6-4 6-4). During the match Carlos Manuel Aguilar scored 64 points vs Muamba’s 51. Carlos Manuel Aguilar was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Carlos Manuel Aguilar blasted 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 79% (15/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Carlos Manuel Aguilar broke Muamba twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Juan’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Pittsburgh.
The Canadian has a composed 23-21 win-loss record in 2023, 6-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hussey | Carlos Manuel Aguilar |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 20 |
| Pts | 88-70 | 64-51 |
| Total Points | 158 | 115 |
| Winners | 33 | 27 |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% |
Both Hussey and Carlos Manuel Aguilar played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Giles Hussey surrendered 1 set while Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Hussey has played 1 set more than Carlos Manuel Aguilar (3 vs 2). Therefore, Hussey played 7 games more than Carlos Manuel Aguilar. Hussey scored 33 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Juan struck 27 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hussey | Carlos Manuel Aguilar |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 42/73 | 35/54 |
| %1st in | 58% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 33/42 | 27/35 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/19 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 79% |
Hussey fired 2 aces . Carlos Manuel Aguilar blasted 4 aces . Hussey won 79% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Carlos Manuel Aguilar won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 79% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hussey | Carlos Manuel Aguilar |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 2 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 46% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 25% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Hussey broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Hussey dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Juan broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Carlos Manuel Aguilar was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Hussey | |||
| Q1 Matuszewski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 88-70 | 88-70 | |
| Total points | 158 | 158 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/73 | 42/73 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 33/42 | 33/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Carlos Manuel Aguilar | |||
| Q1 Muamba |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 64-51 | 64-51 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 35/54 | 35/54 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/19 | 15/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLWLWL
WWWWWLWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Luke SavilleSaville – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – James DuckworthDuckworth (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ben JonesJones – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Enzo WallartWallart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
