Ryan Seggerman and Ben Jones will face off in the qualifications of the Calgary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Seggerman who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ryan Seggerman is the pick to win this match.
Ryan Seggerman -> 1.43
Ben Jones -> 2.67
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ryan Seggerman vs. Ben Jones
There is no head to head record between Ryan Seggerman and Ben Jones since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Ryan Seggerman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-8 | 4-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 711 (career-high), the American got to the qualifications after defeating Drew Van Orderlain 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Seggerman had a good straight sets win against Van Orderlain (6-4 6-4). During the match, Seggerman scored 60 points vs Van Orderlain’s 50. The American was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Seggerman managed to score 7 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Ryan Seggerman was quite efficient on serve to win 84% (31/37) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Seggerman broke Van Orderlain twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Seggerman has a solid match record in the last 2 years having won 69% of his matches (33-15). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Seggerman has an overall1-0 win-loss record in the last 2 years on indoor hard courts.
Seggerman’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Monastir.
Seggerman has a composed 28-12 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Calgary Challenger
Seggerman has never competed in this tournament before.
Ben Jones
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-14 | 8-6 | 0-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
| 2023 | 22-30 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 15-16 | 0-2 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 18-13 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 28-15 | 19-10 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 894, the Brit got to the qualifications after defeating Gabriel Decamps 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jones had a good straight sets win against Decamps (6-3 6-4). During the match Jones scored 67 points vs Decamps’s 50. Jones was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Jones blasted 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ben Jones lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Jones put 78% of his first serves in, winning 77% (33/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (6/12) on the 2nd serve. Jones broke Decamps 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Jones’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Montreal.
Jones has a compiled 21-26 win-loss record in 2023, 15-14 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Seggerman | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 |
| Pts | 60-50 | 67-50 |
| Total Points | 110 | 117 |
| Winners | 31 | 33 |
| %Winners | 52% | 49% |
Both Seggerman and Jones played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Seggerman and Jones have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Seggerman played 1 game more than Jones. The American scored 31 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Jones blasted 33 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Seggerman | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 5 |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 43/55 |
| %1st in | 66% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 33/43 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 6/12 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 50% |
Seggerman bagged 7 aces . Jones bagged 5 aces . Seggerman won 84% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Jones won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Seggerman | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 38% |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Ryan broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Ryan extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. Jones broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jones conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Seggerman | |||
| Q1 Van Orderlain |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 60-50 | 60-50 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 31/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Jones | |||
| Q1 Decamps |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 43/55 | 43/55 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 33/43 | 33/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWLWW
LWLLLLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Luke SavilleSaville – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – James DuckworthDuckworth (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ben JonesJones – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Enzo WallartWallart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
