Aidan Mayo and Ethan Quinn will play each other in the semifinal of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 4:00 pm on BRENDA MYERS COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.74
Aidan Mayo -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Aidan Mayo vs. Ethan Quinn
This will be the 3rd time that Aidan Mayo and Ethan Quinn fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Mayo and Quinn (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Mayo won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in the Tiburon Challenger back in October 2023.
Aidan Mayo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 376, the American reached the semifinal after defeating Douglas Yaffa 6-2 6-2, Christian Harrison 2-6 7-5 6-2, Alafia Ayeni 7-5 6-2, Reilly Opelka w/o and Alexander Ritschard 6-3 6-4.
In the quarter, Mayo had a good straight sets win against Ritschard (6-3 6-4). During the match, Mayo scored 60 points vs Ritschard’s 40. Mayo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mayo managed to score 8 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults. Overall, Aidan Mayo was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (19/23) of his 1st serve and 70% (21/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Aidan broke Ritschard 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Mayo has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (92-62). 19-5 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mayo has a compiled22-8 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Aidan’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Xalapa,M15 Tabasco and M25 Dallas.
Mayo has an overall 45-25 win-loss record in 2023, 19-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Mayo has never competed in this tournament before.
Ethan Quinn
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 18-20 | 11-9 | 2-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 458, Quinn got to the semifinal after beating James Hopper 6-0 6-3, Dylan Dietrich 7-61 6-3, Mitchell Krueger 3-6 7-62 6-4, Emilio Nava 6-3 6-1 and Benoit Paire 7-65 6-2.
In the quarter, The American had a good straight sets win against Paire (7-65 6-2). During the match Quinn scored 86 points vs Paire’s 72. Quinn was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Quinn managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 69% of his first serves in, winning 70% (37/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the 2nd serve. Quinn broke Paire 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Ethan has an overall 18-13 win-loss record in 2023, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mayo | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 5 |
Tot Set | 9 | 11 |
Tot Games | 83 | 106 |
Pts | 287-223 | 390-301 |
Total Points | 510 | 691 |
Winners | 108 | 159 |
%Winners | 38% | 41% |
Mayo played 4 matches while Quinn competed in 5 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Aidan Mayo lost 1 set, while Ethan Quinn dropped 1 set. Mayo has played 2 set(s) less than Quinn (9 vs 11). Therefore, Mayo played 23 games less than Quinn. Mayo scored 108 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn blasted 159 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mayo | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Aces | 25 | 24 |
Avg per match | 6.3 | 4.8 |
1st in | 138/253 | 200/330 |
%1st in | 55% | 61% |
1st pts | 108/138 | 159/200 |
%1st pts | 78% | 80% |
2nd pts | 68/115 | 67/130 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 52% |
Mayo blasted 25 aces (6.3 per match). Quinn struck 24 aces (4.8 per match). Mayo won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mayo | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Won | 15 | 18 |
Converted | 15/28 | 18/41 |
% Converted | 54% | 44% |
Conceded | 21 | 20 |
Saved | 16 | 15 |
% Saved | 76% | 75% |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Aidan broke his opponents 15 times with a 54% conversion rate. Mayo dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. Ethan broke his opponents 18 times with a 44% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Mayo | |||||||
Q1 Yaffa | Q3 Harrison | R1 Ayeni | R2 Opelka | 1/4 Ritschard | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | 7-5 6-2 | w/o | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | – | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 28 | 20 | – | 19 | 83 | |
pts | 73-49 | 88-84 | 66-50 | – | 60-40 | 287-223 | |
Total points | 122 | 172 | 116 | – | 100 | 510 | |
Winners | 22 | 38 | 29 | – | 19 | 108 | |
%Winners | 30% | 43% | 44% | – | 32% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 7 | 5 | 5 | – | 8 | 25 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 1 | – | 0 | 5 | |
1st in | 28/48 | 52/94 | 35/58 | – | 23/53 | 138/253 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 55% | 60% | – | 43% | 55% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 38/52 | 29/35 | – | 19/23 | 108/138 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 73% | 83% | – | 83% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 21/42 | 14/23 | – | 21/30 | 68/115 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 50% | 61% | – | 70% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | – | 3 | 15 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 4/7 | 3/4 | – | 3/5 | 15/28 | |
Converted % | 42% | 57% | 75% | – | 60% | 54% | |
Conceded | 6 | 9 | 3 | – | 3 | 21 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 6/9 | 3/3 | – | 2/3 | 16 | |
Saved % | 83% | 67% | 100% | – | 67% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | 1 | 5 |
Quinn | |||||||
Q1 Hopper | Q3 Dietrich | R1 Krueger | R2 Nava | 1/4 Paire | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-3 | 7-61 6-3 | 3-6 7-62 6-4 | 6-3 6-1 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 32 | 16 | 21 | 106 | |
pts | 61-33 | 80-58 | 97-91 | 66-47 | 86-72 | 390-301 | |
Total points | 94 | 138 | 188 | 113 | 158 | 691 | |
Winners | 24 | 34 | 44 | 20 | 37 | 159 | |
%Winners | 39% | 43% | 45% | 30% | 43% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 3 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 24 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
1st in | 30/37 | 37/62 | 55/100 | 25/54 | 53/77 | 200/330 | |
% 1st in | 81% | 60% | 55% | 46% | 69% | 61% | |
1st pts | 24/30 | 34/37 | 44/55 | 20/25 | 37/53 | 159/200 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 92% | 80% | 80% | 70% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 4/7 | 11/25 | 22/45 | 16/29 | 14/24 | 67/130 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 44% | 49% | 55% | 58% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 18 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 3/6 | 3/4 | 4/11 | 3/10 | 18/41 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | 75% | 36% | 30% | 44% | |
Conceded | 0 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 20 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 3/6 | 3/3 | 7/8 | 15 | |
Saved % | – | 67% | 50% | 100% | 88% | 61% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Brandon HoltHolt (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Benoit PairePaire (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- John-Patrick Smith/Sem VerbeekSmith/Sem Verbeek – Dylan Dietrich/James HopperDietrich/James Hopper (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction