Benoit Paire and Ethan Quinn will face off in the quarter of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 6:00 pm on BRENDA MYERS COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Benoit Paire who should win in 3 sets.
Benoit Paire -> 1.82
Ethan Quinn -> 1.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Benoit Paire vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Benoit Paire and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Benoit Paire
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 6-15 | 3-6 | 0-3 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-38 | 13-12 | 27-17 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 16-31 | 7-13 | 6-14 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 14-32 | 6-12 | 7-13 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-13 | 8-6 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 126, Paire reached the quarter after beating Darian King 7-63 6-2 and Lucas Gerch w/o.
In the 2nd round, Benoit defeated Gerch (w/o). During the match, Paire and Gerch scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 126 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Paire was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Paire was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Benoit Paire conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Paire has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (294-286). 4-5 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Paire has an aggregate 71-54 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Puerto Vallarta Challenger where he overcame Yuta Shimizu in the final 3-6 6-0 6-2 and the San Benedetto Challenger where he overcame Richard Gasquet in the final 4-6 6-1 6-1.
Benoit has a compiled 40-34 win-loss record in 2023, 4-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Paire has never competed in this tournament before.
Ethan Quinn
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-19 | 10-8 | 2-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 458, Quinn got to the quarter after beating James Hopper 6-0 6-3, Dylan Dietrich 7-61 6-3, Mitchell Krueger 3-6 7-62 6-4 and Emilio Nava 6-3 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Ethan had a good straight sets win against Nava (6-3 6-1). During the match Quinn scored 66 points vs Nava’s 47. Quinn was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn made 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ethan Quinn was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (20/25) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Quinn broke Nava 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Quinn started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Ethan’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Ethan has an overall 17-13 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Paire | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 4 |
Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
Tot Games | 21 | 85 |
Pts | 81-68 | 304-229 |
Total Points | 149 | 533 |
Winners | 21 | 122 |
%Winners | 26% | 40% |
Paire played 1 match while Quinn competed in 4 matches. Quinn started his run from the qualifications while Paire had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ethan Quinn lost 1 set while Benoit Paire hasn’t lost a set so far. Paire has played 7 set(s) less than Quinn (2 vs 9). Therefore, Paire played 64 games less than Quinn. Paire scored 21 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn fired 122 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Paire | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 19 |
Avg per match | 6 | 4.8 |
1st in | 30/68 | 147/253 |
%1st in | 44% | 58% |
1st pts | 21/30 | 122/147 |
%1st pts | 70% | 83% |
2nd pts | 21/38 | 53/106 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 50% |
Paire recorded 6 aces . Quinn recorded 19 aces (4.8 per match). Paire won 70% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Paire | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 15 |
Converted | 4/13 | 15/31 |
% Converted | 31% | 48% |
Conceded | 3 | 12 |
Saved | 1 | 8 |
% Saved | 33% | 67% |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Paire broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Ethan broke his opponents 15 times with a 48% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Paire | ||||
R1 King | R2 Gerch | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 6-2 | w/o | ||
Tot Set | 2 | – | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | – | 21 | |
pts | 81-68 | – | 81-68 | |
Total points | 149 | – | 149 | |
Winners | 21 | – | 21 | |
%Winners | 26% | – | 26% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | – | 6 | |
Double Faults | 4 | – | 4 | |
1st in | 30/68 | – | 30/68 | |
% 1st in | 44% | – | 44% | |
1st pts | 21/30 | – | 21/30 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | – | 70% | |
2nd pts | 21/38 | – | 21/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | – | 55% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | – | 4 | |
Converted | 4/13 | – | 4/13 | |
Converted % | 31% | – | 31% | |
Conceded | 3 | – | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | – | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | – | 17% | |
Times Broken | 2 | – | 2 |
Quinn | ||||||
Q1 Hopper | Q3 Dietrich | R1 Krueger | R2 Nava | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-3 | 7-61 6-3 | 3-6 7-62 6-4 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 32 | 16 | 85 | |
pts | 61-33 | 80-58 | 97-91 | 66-47 | 304-229 | |
Total points | 94 | 138 | 188 | 113 | 533 | |
Winners | 24 | 34 | 44 | 20 | 122 | |
%Winners | 39% | 43% | 45% | 30% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 3 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 19 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
1st in | 30/37 | 37/62 | 55/100 | 25/54 | 147/253 | |
% 1st in | 81% | 60% | 55% | 46% | 58% | |
1st pts | 24/30 | 34/37 | 44/55 | 20/25 | 122/147 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 92% | 80% | 80% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 4/7 | 11/25 | 22/45 | 16/29 | 53/106 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 44% | 49% | 55% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 3/6 | 3/4 | 4/11 | 15/31 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | 75% | 36% | 48% | |
Conceded | 0 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 3/6 | 3/3 | 8 | |
Saved % | – | 67% | 50% | 100% | 109% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Brandon HoltHolt (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- John-Patrick Smith/Sem VerbeekSmith/Sem Verbeek – Dylan Dietrich/James HopperDietrich/James Hopper (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction